Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #51243
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys() |
| Date | 2013-07-25 18:25 +0200 |
| Organization | None |
| References | (3 earlier) <mailman.5061.1374692206.3114.python-list@python.org> <51f0ce06$0$29971$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CAPTjJmoFw-tM0itPJFBqO37fPBM9UHTosCACy2Xy0Wjm2dgZmQ@mail.gmail.com> <ksqmmk$lq2$1@ger.gmane.org> <CALwzid=NQNijkX_JXyoGnMRjV+t6i4uFGGfjKGKid=BvUkx42w@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5111.1374769510.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Ian Kelly wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote: >> Chris Angelico wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Steven D'Aprano >>> <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote: >>>> - Views support efficient (O(1) in the case of keys) membership >>>> testing, which neither iterkeys() nor Python2 keys() does. >>> >>> To save me the trouble and potential error of digging through the >>> source code: What's the complexity of membership testing on >>> values/items? Since you're calling it "efficient" it must be better >>> than O(n) which the list form would be, yet it isn't O(1) or you >>> wouldn't have qualified "in the case of keys". Does this mean >>> membership testing of the values and items views is O(log n) in some >>> way, eg a binary search? >> >> keys() and items() is O(1); both look up the key in the dictionary and >> items() then proceeds to compare the value. values() is O(n). > > 3.x values() is O(n) but avoids the unnecessary step of copying all the > values in the dict that you get when performing the same operation > using 2.x values(). Hence, although the asymptotic complexity is the > same, it's still more efficient. In Python 2 the prudent pythonista used itervalues() to avoid unnecessary intermediate list...
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys() Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-07-24 11:31 -0700
Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys() alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2013-07-25 16:01 +1000
Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys() Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-07-25 06:47 -0700
Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-25 07:04 +0000
Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-07-25 18:02 +1000
Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys() Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-07-25 10:13 +0200
Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-07-25 09:53 -0600
Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys() Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-07-25 18:25 +0200
csiph-web