Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #51223

Re: Python Script Hashplings

References <51F12B41.3050004@Gmail.com> <51F12E31.1070502@mrabarnett.plus.com>
From Matthew Lefavor <mclefavor@gmail.com>
Date 2013-07-25 10:01 -0400
Subject Re: Python Script Hashplings
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.5099.1374760944.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

The answer is "probably not." If you just want to use the latest version of
Python 3 you have installed on your system, use: "#!/usr/bin/python3". When
you use the specific minor version numbers, they point to that specific
minor version.

Actually, the preferred shebang line is of the form: "#!/usr/bin/env
python3". This way the end users can override the interpreter with, say, a
virtualenv, rather than being stuck with the system default.


On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:54 AM, MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:

> On 25/07/2013 14:42, Devyn Collier Johnson wrote:
>
>> If I execute a Python3 script with this haspling (#!/usr/bin/python3.3)
>> and Python3.3 is not installed, but Python3.2 is installed, would the
>> script still work? Would it fall back to Python3.2?
>>
>>  Why don't you try it?
>
>
>  I hope Dihedral is listening. I would like to see another response from
>> HIM.
>>
>>
> --
> http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/python-list<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>
>

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Python Script Hashplings Matthew Lefavor <mclefavor@gmail.com> - 2013-07-25 10:01 -0400

csiph-web