Re: Is the Usenet to mailing list gateway borked?

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!selfless.tophat.at!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<bahamutzero8825@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.112
X-Spam-Level	*
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.78; 'S': 0.00; 'through.': 0.09; 'wrote:': 0.15; 'pm,': 0.16; 'subject:list': 0.16; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'subject:mailing': 0.23; 'hall': 0.26; "didn't": 0.29; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.32; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.34; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'possible,': 0.34; 'but': 0.37; 'could': 0.37; 'received:192': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'think': 0.38; 'two': 0.38; 'received:192.168.1': 0.39; 'happened': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.40; 'received:209.85.218.46': 0.91; 'received:mail- yi0-f46.google.com': 0.91
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=p7/vRv/25IgXMMLRof/hNb8FpVqt+PlS0WMtIcC2SvY=; b=j1rwzbG9vDuFPbdqX7FK7e33oHsYw6XmBvRtZ3EfkK4PR0AP1saaRj+woPyWGwILJ1 SHz473F6QN6eB82emLA7k6oKALBtlkPfRmEROH9+boDK5eahIqCRHrzqzLnO6MZsaVbA xbrV/ZE4tKUTHNWZK1Qq+K6CpWMlikfGfHEAo=
Date	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:00:06 -0500
From	Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com>
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.5
MIME-Version	1.0
To	"comp.lang.python" <python-list@python.org>
Subject	Re: Is the Usenet to mailing list gateway borked?
References	<4E0B8C63.2030009@gmail.com> <BANLkTik9iG-xmuRFWnbrFa2YrPaxMmpZ5w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To	<BANLkTik9iG-xmuRFWnbrFa2YrPaxMmpZ5w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version	1.1.1
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.12
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.509.1309381220.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	7
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1309381220 news.xs4all.nl 21815 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53629
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8583

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2011.06.29 03:53 PM, Noah Hall wrote:
> I think the more likely answer is that it was sent without being also
> sent to python-list.
Possible, but they were two messages from two different people and
happened within a few hours of each other, so it could be that the two
messages didn't go through. I don't know which is more likely; I only
ask to find out.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Is the Usenet to mailing list gateway borked? Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-06-29 16:00 -0500

csiph-web