Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63285
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" |
| Date | 2014-01-06 14:55 +0000 |
| References | <lablra$1mc$2@ger.gmane.org> <ladb8t$o3n$1@ger.gmane.org> <lae85j$pub$1@ger.gmane.org> <201401060932.35410.gheskett@wdtv.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5020.1389020181.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 06/01/2014 14:32, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 06 January 2014 08:52:42 Ned Batchelder did opine: > [...] >> You are still talking about whether Armin is right, and whether he >> writes well, about flaws in his statistics, etc. I'm talking about the >> fact that an organization (Python core development) has a product >> (Python 3) that is getting bad press. Popular and vocal customers >> (Armin, Kenneth, and others) are unhappy. What is being done to make >> them happy? Who is working with them? They are not unique, and their >> viewpoints are not outliers. >> >> I'm not talking about the technical details of bytes and Unicode. I'm >> talking about making customers happy. > > +1 Ned. Quite well said. > > And from my lurking here, its quite plain to me that 3.x python has a > problem with everyday dealing with strings. If it is not solved relatively > quickly, then I expect there will be a fork, a 2.8 by those most heavily > invested. Or an exodus to the next "cool" language. > It's not at all plain to me, in fact quite the opposite. Please expand on these problems for mere mortals such as myself. -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-01-06 14:55 +0000
csiph-web