Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #101533

Re: I'm missing something here...

From Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: I'm missing something here...
Date 2016-01-12 09:13 +0000
Message-ID <mailman.50.1452590005.13488.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <569440EB.4090204@lucidity.plus.com> <20160112071322.GA12153@cskk.homeip.net> <5694B84D.4060803@lucidity.plus.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Apologies for self-replying

On 12/01/16 08:24, Erik wrote:
> On 12/01/16 07:13, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>> The former. Almost any loop _might_ be executed zero times. Compilers
>> and linters etc should only complain if they can prove the loop is
>> always executed zero times.
>
> I was just raising the
> possibility that the bug could have been that the loop was (incorrectly)
> determined to be executed zero times for some reason.

Having just read it again, I note that Skip said he'd changed the |= to 
something different (and I've since read the solution to the question).

I had misread what Skip said to mean he had added a new line _after_ the 
'for' loop which touched the variable.

E.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: I'm missing something here... Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> - 2016-01-12 09:13 +0000

csiph-web