Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #89756

Re: Python is not bad ;-)

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <davea@davea.name>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.005
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:not': 0.03; 'anyway.': 0.05; 'guido': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'abuse': 0.07; 'debugging.': 0.09; 'naturally': 0.09; 'optimizing': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'abusing': 0.16; 'iteration': 0.16; 'said.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'replace': 0.24; "shouldn't": 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'converting': 0.30; 'strongly': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'maintaining': 0.32; 'actively': 0.33; 'could': 0.34; 'really': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'implement': 0.38; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'anything': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'simple,': 0.60; "you're": 0.61; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'optimized': 0.68; 'received:74.208': 0.68; 'integrity': 0.74; 'manner.': 0.74; 'recursion,': 0.84
Date Sat, 02 May 2015 06:22:20 -0400
From Dave Angel <davea@davea.name>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Python is not bad ;-)
References <87mw1q9jqw.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.121.1430385051.3680.python-list@python.org> <87383hj4zj.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87d22lx38x.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <55432557$0$12994$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87383fo062.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <87egmzl4yr.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <mailman.4.1430558719.12865.python-list@python.org> <87a8xnl2r6.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>
In-Reply-To <87a8xnl2r6.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Provags-ID V03:K0:8VjQO6kuczEUKdZt3XGqDB86eTibwfbrbE/Alm6S3QCB5krWl1r AkiwRqANzSiTCpzsPZ9zTSOQ5rMp1TzpvKbSDW/Byqiy7v8oyo9LHKNP7bXltKSm8WWWmBx EF3aP8t4jQOEZJ/tlowlvLslNkQTYfliJSZKSA1Xkz1MHJ6xM9TPfmPq2w4eMcXz6mvXrxg WPlHy19Gf7MzKGw95W0cw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults notjunk:1;
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.5.1430562152.12865.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 30
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1430562152 news.xs4all.nl 2845 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33110
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:89756

Show key headers only | View raw

On 05/02/2015 05:58 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>:
>
>> Guido is against anything that disrupts tracebacks, and optimizing
>> tail recursion while maintaining traceback integrity is rather harder.
>
> Tail recursion could be suppressed during debugging. Optimized code can
> play all kinds of non-obvious tricks with the execution frame.
>
>> In the situations where it really is simple, you can always make the
>> change in your own code anyway. Often, the process of converting
>> recursion into tail recursion warps the code to the point where it's
>> abusing recursion to implement iteration anyway, so just make it
>> iterative.
>
> While you shouldn't actively replace Python iteration with recursion, I
> strongly disagree that naturally occurring tail recursion is abuse or
> should be avoided in any manner.
>

When you strongly disagree, make sure you're disagreeing with what Chris 
actually said.  The key phrase in his message was
     "converting recursion into tail recursion"

NOT  "converting iteration into recursion"
and NOT "naturally occurring tail recursion"


-- 
DaveA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Python is not bad ;-) Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-30 09:07 +0200
  Re: Python is not bad ;-) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-04-30 19:10 +1000
    Re: Python is not bad ;-) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-04-30 13:16 +0300
      Re: Python is not bad ;-) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-30 20:52 +1000
      Re: Python is not bad ;-) Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-30 13:30 +0200
        Re: Python is not bad ;-) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-01 17:03 +1000
          Re: Python is not bad ;-) Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-01 09:47 +0200
          Re: Python is not bad ;-) Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-05-01 19:56 +0200
          Re: Python is not bad ;-) Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-05-02 19:44 +1200
          Re: Python is not bad ;-) Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-02 10:26 +0200
            Re: Python is not bad ;-) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-05-02 12:10 +0300
              Re: Python is not bad ;-) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-02 19:25 +1000
                Re: Python is not bad ;-) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-05-02 12:58 +0300
                Re: Python is not bad ;-) Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-02 06:22 -0400
                Re: Python is not bad ;-) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-02 20:42 +1000
                Re: Python is not bad ;-) Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-05-02 13:07 +0200
                Re: Python is not bad ;-) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-02 21:21 +1000
                Re: Python is not bad ;-) Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-05-02 13:32 +0200
                Re: Python is not bad ;-) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-05-02 14:42 +0300
                Re: Python is not bad ;-) Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-02 09:45 -0600
                Re: Python is not bad ;-) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-03 01:55 +1000
                Re: Python is not bad ;-) Joonas Liik <liik.joonas@gmail.com> - 2015-05-02 16:50 +0300
                Re: Python is not bad ;-) Joonas Liik <liik.joonas@gmail.com> - 2015-05-02 18:53 +0300
                Re: Python is not bad ;-) Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-02 11:00 -0600
                Re: Python is not bad ;-) Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-02 11:17 -0600
                Re: Python is not bad ;-) Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-02 18:22 +0100
              Re: Python is not bad ;-) Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-02 12:29 +0200
            Re: Python is not bad ;-) Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-02 11:33 +0200
              Re: Python is not bad ;-) Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-02 06:35 -0400
                Re: Python is not bad ;-) Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-02 13:12 +0200
              Re: Python is not bad ;-) Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-02 09:31 -0600
      Re: Python is not bad ;-) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-01 15:56 +1000
    Re: Python is not bad ;-) Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-30 13:10 +0200
  Re: Python is not bad ;-) Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-04-30 08:03 -0600
    Re: Python is not bad ;-) Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-30 18:11 +0200
      Re: Python is not bad ;-) Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-04-30 19:59 +0200
        Re: Python is not bad ;-) Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-30 22:05 +0200

csiph-web