Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #19295

Re: while True or while 1

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <dihedral88888@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.010
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'debug': 0.03; 'exception,': 0.07; 'something,': 0.07; 'subject:while': 0.07; 'used.': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; '*i*': 0.09; 'loop.': 0.09; 'reply- to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'throw': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'c++': 0.12; 'cc:addr:python- list': 0.15; '"while': 0.16; '++i)': 0.16; 'boolean': 0.16; 'driscoll': 0.16; 'evaluates': 0.16; 'iterator': 0.16; 'iterator.': 0.16; 'throws': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'converted': 0.18; 'slightly': 0.19; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.21; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'faster,': 0.23; 'there.': 0.25; 'pm,': 0.26; "i'm": 0.27; 'bit': 0.28; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'definition': 0.30; '*and*': 0.30; 'least': 0.30; 'adds': 0.32; 'implementing': 0.32; 'idea': 0.32; "can't": 0.32; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.33; 'from:addr:googlemail.com': 0.34; 'advocate': 0.34; 'builds': 0.34; 'integer': 0.34; 'latter': 0.34; 'typical': 0.34; 'received:209.85.160': 0.35; 'cc:2**1': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'moment,': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'think': 0.38; 'should': 0.38; 'processing': 0.39; "i'd": 0.39; 'point': 0.39; 'why': 0.39; 'called': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'might': 0.40; 'more': 0.61; 'accepts': 0.64; 'harder': 0.64; 'same,': 0.67; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.71; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'hate': 0.73; 'reply-to:addr:googlegroups.com': 0.74; '06:05': 0.84; '8bit%:60': 0.84; '8bit%:61': 0.84; 'c..': 0.84; 'difference.': 0.84; 'hair,': 0.84; 'idiom': 0.84; 'place?': 0.84; 'skip:2 50': 0.91; 'supporter': 0.91
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Date Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:42:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <mailman.4983.1327351819.27778.python-list@python.org>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=112.104.167.201; posting-account=5JdMBQoAAABHnS4mjpqEzxnmWtgiiVNw
References <4F1AC1D4.2080402@gmail.com> <mailman.4909.1327157944.27778.python-list@python.org> <pL-dnUjq2eH3t4bSnZ2dnUVZ5vudnZ2d@giganews.com> <CAFYqXL8PPOi2dy7M0ae+zCVB2yD6hPDdr7q8MhL0waadqoWvuw@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzidm5NvdqCjrSTap2BE_mrgK9BjK7FEeGAM_cX=BDMKMrzQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F1DA186.1040807@wisc.edu> <mailman.4983.1327351819.27778.python-list@python.org>
User-Agent G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client true
MIME-Version 1.0
Subject Re: while True or while 1
From 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com>
To comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
Reply-To comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Message-ID <mailman.4993.1327358527.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 58
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1327358527 news.xs4all.nl 6870 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39774
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:19295

Show key headers only | View raw


在 2012年1月24日星期二UTC+8上午4时50分11秒,Andrea Crotti写道:
> On 01/23/2012 06:05 PM, Evan Driscoll wrote:
> >
> > To play devil's advocate for a moment, if you have the choice between 
> > two ways of writing something, A and B, where both are basically the 
> > same in terms of difficulty to write, difficulty to maintain, and 
> > difficulty to understand, but A is faster than B, even if just by a 
> > hair, why NOT write A?
> >
> > It's like 'iter++' vs '++iter' in a C++ for loop. For ints, or for 
> > some iterators with optimization, it makes no difference. But the 
> > latter will be faster in debug builds, and *might* be faster in 
> > release builds if you have a complicated iterator. So why NOT make 
> > for(...; ...; ++i) the typical way of writing a for loop?
> >
> > In the Python world, is 'while 1' any harder to understand than 'while 
> > True'? I'm about as staunch a supporter as you'll find for the idea 
> > that 'while 1' should throw an exception, and even *I* think that 
> > 'while 1' is about the least-offensive idiom out there. If 'while 1' 
> > throws you off, I'd hate to see what you do when you learn that Python 
> > accepts loops like 'while x' where the condition evaluates to true if 
> > x is a non-zero integer and false if x is 0.
> >
> >
> > All that said, I like the 'while "stuff to do"' idea.
> >
> > Evan
> 
> I think it's not the same, iter++ or ++iter is exactly the same in terms 
> of readability, so of course
> if one might be a bit faster, it should be used.
> 
> while 1 works because the 1 is converted to boolean automatically, but 
> why not just writing a boolean
> in the first place?
> 
> It's not bad of course but to me it's not very Pythonic, and reminds me C.
> At that point I also prefer the "while 'might be long loop'" idea, which 
> at least
> adds some value *and* it might be very slightly faster too.

 A fake generator that can't be cascaded for more processing  can be called
 an iterator by the definition of an iterator. 

But that is miss-leading in implementing silly trivial non-qualified iterators.


Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: while True or while 1 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-01-22 01:59 +1100
  Re: while True or while 1 Erik Max Francis <max@alcyone.com> - 2012-01-21 13:13 -0800
    Re: while True or while 1 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-01-22 09:13 +1100
      Re: while True or while 1 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-01-22 05:25 +0000
        Re: while True or while 1 Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2012-01-22 16:05 +0000
          Re: while True or while 1 alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-01-22 19:55 -0800
            Re: while True or while 1 Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-01-23 08:02 -0500
              Re: while True or while 1 Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xemacs.org> - 2012-01-23 14:28 +0100
                Re: while True or while 1 Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-01-23 13:33 -0500
        Re: while True or while 1 MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-01-22 16:13 +0000
    Re: while True or while 1 Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-23 15:51 +0000
    Re: while True or while 1 Giampaolo Rodolà <g.rodola@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 17:41 +0100
      Re: while True or while 1 Erik Max Francis <max@alcyone.com> - 2012-01-23 11:12 -0800
        Re: while True or while 1 Giampaolo Rodolà <g.rodola@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 21:20 +0100
    Re: while True or while 1 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 10:39 -0700
    Re: while True or while 1 Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu> - 2012-01-23 12:05 -0600
    Re: while True or while 1 Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 20:50 +0000
      Re: while True or while 1 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-23 14:42 -0800
      Re: while True or while 1 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-23 14:42 -0800
      Re: while True or while 1 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-01-24 03:37 +0000

csiph-web