Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63102
| References | <CACwCsY5P47-dB1NLQTUTQ=0aF6B+-M3y4hCxcUGmcVmHM8=-xQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmp+NtGYWE3S3SGjo-xoYC74Exdpci_+x4AUNgqM5=CJNQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGGBd_ooeJLsW_eoEBbrbiv9zxm_75bvWnO1U8JEj8xOnNwMfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmrbXLQP9gYwpzjQta6Mn78gDBQ39vFfsi7R7+42pMxeCw@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-03 19:32 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Creating a list with holes |
| From | Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4880.1388806336.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Depending on what exactly you need, it's probably worth just using a
>>> dict. In what ways do you need it to function as a list? You can
>>> always iterate over sorted(some_dict.keys()) if you need to run
>>> through them in order.
>>
>> FWIW, sorting inside a loop is rarely a good idea, unless your lists
>> are pretty small.
>
> What do you mean by "sorting inside a loop"? I was thinking of this:
>
> for key in sorted(some_dict.keys()):
> # blah blah
>
> which will sort once and then iterate over it.
That is fine, sorting once at then end of a script is a good use of
sorted(some_dict.keys()). However, it probably should be pointed out
that this, while similar, is not so good:
for thing in range(n):
for key in sorted(some_dict.keys()):
do_something(thing, key)
...because it's sorting n times.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Creating a list with holes Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2014-01-03 19:32 -0800
csiph-web