Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #62960

Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey

References <mailman.4731.1388440598.18130.python-list@python.org> <hqr7c9dce9krvt7rm49ujptl4dl9mr68gl@4ax.com> <52c3fe0b$0$29984$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <th28c95ouhqmicaerkor4sf1l9vv4gv4ub@4ax.com>
Date 2014-01-02 01:07 +1100
Subject Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey
From David <bouncingcats@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.4779.1388585277.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 1 January 2014 23:38, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:
>
> I was thinking or of this:
>
>>>> python g:\work\module1.py
>   File "<stdin>", line 1
>     python g:\work\module1.py
>            ^
>
> Which gave a different error the previous time I did it.
>
> But, hey, it worked from the DOS prompt
>
> C:\Python32>python g:\work\module1.py
> Hello Module World

Your windows command shell prompt looks like this: "C:\Python32>"
It indicates that windows shell is waiting for you to type something.
It expects the first word you type to be an executable command. If you
do this:
  C:\Python32>python g:\work\module1.py
it tells the shell to run the python interpreter and feed it all the
python statments contained in the file g:\work\module1.py

If you do this:
  C:\Python32>python
it tells the shell to run the python interpreter interactively, and
wait for you to directly type python statements. When the python
intepreter is ready for you to type a python statement, it gives you a
">>>" prompt. It expects you to type a valid python language
statement.

The reason this gave an error:
>>> python g:\work\module1.py

is because you are using the python interpreter as shown by ">>>", but
you typed a windows shell command, not a python statement.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-12-30 13:56 -0800
  Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2014-01-01 12:41 +0200
    Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-01 21:52 +1100
    Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-01-01 22:37 +1100
      Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2014-01-01 14:38 +0200
        Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-01 23:39 +1100
        Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-01-01 12:44 +0000
        Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2014-01-02 01:07 +1100
          Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2014-01-01 19:55 +0200
        Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-01-01 09:32 -0500
    Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-01-01 12:54 -0500
  Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-01-10 09:36 -0800
    Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-01-10 12:48 -0500
      Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-01-10 11:43 -0800
        Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-01-10 19:53 +0000
        Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-01-10 14:50 -0500
    Re: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-01-10 10:02 -0800

csiph-web