Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #18924
| References | <CAOFf2a0RZo=o9r=We=iGUutfNn9SCeJUMn7ZM+hq=o7RoCN1bg@mail.gmail.com> <CAE-UAvQ1O_RVuSF9ferWQac0G83o07eRSX_Tgc7Md_w1hsLHag@mail.gmail.com> <CAOFf2a1n2DuahuyhNWKZhLhEH65S_ARSr0kvNtTH0hUfQKvAEw@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-13 18:39 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: open office in another language? |
| From | Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4716.1326472741.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 00:17, Sean Wolfe <ether.joe@gmail.com> wrote: > hmm I didn't know this, nice to know. Yes, C++ is still enough > overhead that I wouldn't want to try extending it ... I bet the code > is a whole lot to try and grok. > When Apache got the LibreOffice project they heavily refactored the code. As a result, LO is considered less of a monstrosity to hack on than Open Office. That said, if your goal is to "try to extend" an application, then being written in Java as opposed to C++ would be an advantage, not a disadvantage. Especially in an application the size of OOo. That said, only a few dialogues and wizards (none critical) are written in Java. Most is C++. > It would be nice to have an office suite in a newer language that is > easier to tinker with. Take a look at Calligra, C++ with Qt. It is supposed to be very easy to extend and port, in fact that was a design goal. http://calligra-suite.org/ -- Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com/what_is/python.html
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: open office in another language? Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@gmail.com> - 2012-01-13 18:39 +0200
Re: open office in another language? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-01-14 08:17 +1100
Re: open office in another language? Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@gmail.com> - 2012-01-14 20:25 +0200
csiph-web