Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3?

References	(2 earlier) <CAJ+TeocpeU2d4R-uNrzCyt1B6w55gbdsyenJBp3SaUgpefBL7g@mail.gmail.com> <CAGGBd_rfjwcGxNqeMLfPT1AkXNORNgCY-DDu4sr-EOQBSS2fKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ+TeocrkFA0McQrL9=9-XCZ1KMDHryNCCA_Xv7cpyiGCPXAkg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.4661.1388142386.18130.python-list@python.org> <52bd65c3$0$29999$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Date	2013-12-27 22:46 +1100
Subject	Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3?
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.4662.1388144773.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote:
> Alternatively, if you don't care about the OS-provided Python (perhaps
> you're providing your own, or you expect your users to install from
> source), then I think it is acceptable to target 2.7 and 3.3 or better
> (e.g. drop support for 3.1 and 3.2). 3.0 is not supported at all -- it was
> a buggy release and was quickly dropped for 3.1. If you're not constrained
> by "yum python3" or "apt-get python3", then 3.3 is probably the version you
> should aim for.

That's about the size of it. I'm quite happy to work with a 3.4 alpha,
but when it comes to installation instructions, "get this and compile
it" is a lot less helpful than "install python3 via your OS package
manager" (especially since compiling Python from source also means
getting the development versions of whatever modules you need -
apt-getting a bunch of -dev packages, or whatever - and if you don't
get them, some modules mightn't work even though core Python does).
Hence I'd like to stick to OS-provided versions *where reasonable* -
I'm not going to warp my code around Python 2.4 unless there's a large
slab of users on that, but I will restrict myself to Pike 7.8.700
because it's worth the effort.

ChrisA

Thread

So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3? Travis McGee <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2013-12-27 00:04 -0500
  Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-27 00:07 -0500
    Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-27 16:14 +1100
  Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3? Andrew Berg <robotsondrugs@gmail.com> - 2013-12-26 23:20 -0600
    Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-01-02 16:34 +0000
  Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-12-26 21:29 -0800
  Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-27 11:13 +0530
  Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-27 17:00 +1100
  Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-12-26 22:23 -0800
  Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-27 16:21 +0530
  Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-27 22:06 +1100
    Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-27 22:34 +1100
      Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-27 22:46 +1100
  Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3? Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-12-27 07:13 -0500
  Re: So, what's the real story on Python 2 vs Python 3? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-01-02 16:28 +0000

csiph-web