Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #50475
| References | <4a81b6a6-023e-4d47-9bd0-bbc0516caf6b@googlegroups.com> <c087829a-8e30-4f50-afb9-d28a779932e3@googlegroups.com> <mailman.4590.1373555714.3114.python-list@python.org> <56736add-f372-4245-9f50-076b3d44bb00@googlegroups.com> <CAHVvXxSDQwk1KVLETetOz5EiNK3BjTD=6px_L9SFfcpfbhuYzA@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-11 20:58 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: xslice idea | a generator slice |
| From | Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4601.1373572738.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 11 Jul 2013 17:38, "Oscar Benjamin" <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11 July 2013 17:21, Russel Walker <russ.pobox@gmail.com> wrote: > > To confess, this is the second time I've made the mistake of trying to implement generator like functionality of a builtin when there already is on in itertools. Need to start studying that module abit more I think. I'm looking at the docs now and I see there are actually a couple of isomethings(). > > Your xslice (or mine) would still be better than islice when the step > size is large; islice has to iterate over all the skipped elements > which could be wasteful if the input is indexable. Also islice doesn't > support negative values for start, stop or step which xslice does. Isn't all of itertools implemented in C? If we are not using a python-level and not-so-fast __getitem__ I would wager the C version is a lot faster. And if the input is indexable could I assume that it is not too large to have around in memory and thus any speed increase in looping over it would be tiny?
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
xslice idea | a generator slice Russel Walker <russ.pobox@gmail.com> - 2013-07-11 07:52 -0700
Re: xslice idea | a generator slice Russel Walker <russ.pobox@gmail.com> - 2013-07-11 07:54 -0700
Re: xslice idea | a generator slice Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-07-11 16:14 +0100
Re: xslice idea | a generator slice Russel Walker <russ.pobox@gmail.com> - 2013-07-11 09:21 -0700
Re: xslice idea | a generator slice Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-07-11 17:34 +0100
Re: xslice idea | a generator slice Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-07-11 12:00 -0600
Re: xslice idea | a generator slice Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-07-11 20:58 +0100
Re: xslice idea | a generator slice Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-07-11 15:02 -0600
Re: xslice idea | a generator slice Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-07-11 10:16 -0600
csiph-web