Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #28831
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Standard Asynchronous Python |
| Date | 2012-09-10 12:21 -0400 |
| References | <mailman.429.1347235672.27098.python-list@python.org> <504d60ab$0$29890$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CAJtE5vSK2=cWf41bRt9phb0S4e1EGrLEx1YCwXb37R_-vX_jhA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.453.1347294106.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 9/10/2012 7:36 AM, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: > The responses have certainly highlighted some errors in emphasis in my approach. > > * My idea is to propose a design PEP. (Steven, Dennis) I'm not at > *all* suggesting including uthreads in the standard library. It's a > toy implementation I used to develop my ideas. I think of this as a > much smaller idea in the same vein as the DBAPI (PEP 249): a common > set of expectations that allows portability. That has been very successful. > * I'd like to set aside the issue of threads vs. event-driven > programming. There are legitimate reasons to do both, and the healthy > ecosystem of frameworks for the latter indicates at least some people > are interested. My idea is to introduce a tiny bit of coherence > across those frameworks. I think many developers recognize that some improvment in coherence would be a good idea. I occasionally read that *someone* is working on common event loop approach, though it has not materialized yet. > I will need to take up the details of the idea with the developers of > the async frameworks themselves, and get some agreement before > actually proposing the PEP. However, among this group I'm interested > to know whether this is an appropriate use of a design PEP. I think so. > That's why I posted my old and flawed PEP text, rather than re-drafting > first. I think you should do a bit of editing now, even if not a full redraft. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Standard Asynchronous Python "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin@v.igoro.us> - 2012-09-09 20:07 -0400
Re: Standard Asynchronous Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-10 03:38 +0000
Re: Standard Asynchronous Python "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin@v.igoro.us> - 2012-09-10 07:36 -0400
Re: Standard Asynchronous Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-10 13:24 +0000
Re: Standard Asynchronous Python Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-09-10 12:21 -0400
Re: Standard Asynchronous Python "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin@v.igoro.us> - 2012-09-11 20:40 -0400
Re: Standard Asynchronous Python Bryan <bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-15 23:45 -0700
Re: Standard Asynchronous Python Bryan <bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-09 20:42 -0700
csiph-web