Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #18647
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <drobinow@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.006 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'args': 0.05; 'args,': 0.09; 'func': 0.09; 'garbage': 0.09; 'referencing': 0.09; 'subject:Function': 0.09; 'def': 0.13; 'stored': 0.13; '*args,': 0.16; '\xa0def': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'arguments': 0.18; 'jan': 0.19; 'seems': 0.20; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.20; 'trying': 0.21; 'holds': 0.21; 'subject:Question': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'code': 0.25; 'function': 0.27; 'cc:addr:gmail.com': 0.28; 'tend': 0.28; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'partial': 0.29; 'toward': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'pm,': 0.29; 'lines': 0.30; 'kelly': 0.30; 'hi,': 0.32; 'skip:\xa0 30': 0.32; 'object': 0.33; 'fri,': 0.34; '8bit%:3': 0.34; 'received:74.125.82': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'cc:2**1': 0.36; 'later,': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'passed': 0.37; 'reference': 0.37; 'received:74.125': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'references': 0.38; 'skip:\xa0 10': 0.39; 'should': 0.39; 'being': 0.39; 'why': 0.39; '8bit%:8': 0.40; 'below': 0.63; '2012': 0.67; 'collection,': 0.84; 'needed:': 0.84; 'skip:d 50': 0.93 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OfmoaMssRtWugwdqJ2b20ybFAMRjO1dziUBTehZqNMw=; b=vsjPY0TZ0jjKRdrDoUOfTHUv4SsZild/xeYeQvrr+Hxgl29G2/kUNbz6cefMXeM+Hm WYHv5okX7Cw8HKXh9Dj904MLE5r1fWPKjL1/7ATuCtq6EJDHxU+dTtxHzRWcuTT4AcO0 LSvl6nbQa+f4aeXhNYETNmca6zfbmIIBshKcc= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <CALwzidneNuQAD6i6rGrVxds482YckmmEY+HHR8q_HLKJOdheOA@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <14889cd9-f02b-4a81-9ccb-8fb8492e1091@n39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <CALwzidneNuQAD6i6rGrVxds482YckmmEY+HHR8q_HLKJOdheOA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Date | Sat, 7 Jan 2012 10:18:15 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Nested Function Question |
| From | David Robinow <drobinow@gmail.com> |
| To | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| Cc | GZ <zyzhu2000@gmail.com>, python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4513.1325949503.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 37 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1325949503 news.xs4all.nl 6918 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40435 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:18647 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:46 PM, GZ <zyzhu2000@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am reading the documentation of functools.partial (http:// >> docs.python.org/library/functools.html#functools.partial) and found >> the following 'reference implementation' of functools.partial. >> >> def partial(func, *args, **keywords): >> def newfunc(*fargs, **fkeywords): >> newkeywords = keywords.copy() >> newkeywords.update(fkeywords) >> return func(*(args + fargs), **newkeywords) >> newfunc.func = func >> newfunc.args = args >> newfunc.keywords = keywords >> return newfunc >> >> I don't understand why the below 3 lines are needed: >> >> newfunc.func = func >> newfunc.args = args >> newfunc.keywords = keywords >> >> >> It is as if they are trying to prevent garbage collection, but I don't >> get why it is needed. As long as something holds reference to newfunc, >> because it in turn references keywords and args, nothing will be >> freed. If nothing is referencing newfunc, then everything should be >> freed. > > They exist for introspection. The partial object has to store the > function and arguments it was passed so that it can call it later, so > as long as they're being stored anyway, why not make them visible? I tend toward the minimalist end of the spectrum when it comes to code commenting, but it seems to me this would be a good place for a few words of explanation.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Nested Function Question GZ <zyzhu2000@gmail.com> - 2012-01-06 13:46 -0800 Re: Nested Function Question Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-01-06 15:04 -0700 Re: Nested Function Question David Robinow <drobinow@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 10:18 -0500 Re: Nested Function Question 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-07 20:43 -0800
csiph-web