Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #62515
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'essentially': 0.04; 'patterns': 0.04; 'static': 0.04; 'cpython': 0.05; 'say,': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'coders': 0.09; 'logic': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'reports.': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'things,': 0.09; 'jan': 0.12; '(about': 0.16; ':-(': 0.16; 'detected': 0.16; 'finds': 0.16; 'for,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'silence': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'trying': 0.19; 'meant': 0.20; 'tests': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'subject:like': 0.24; 'compiled': 0.26; 'define': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'on,': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'errors': 0.30; 'then.': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'apparently': 0.31; 'yourself.': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'worked': 0.33; '(i.e.': 0.33; 'bugs': 0.33; 'tool': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'c++': 0.36; 'false': 0.36; 'leads': 0.36; 'effort': 0.37; 'reports': 0.37; 'unit': 0.37; 'project': 0.37; 'step': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'analysis,': 0.60; 'free': 0.61; 'received:173': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'such': 0.63; 'decided': 0.64; 'our': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'corporate': 0.67; 'smith': 0.68; 'analysis': 0.75; 'day': 0.76; 'depended': 0.84; 'negatives,': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'tricky': 0.84 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
| Subject | Re: Why Python is like C++ |
| Date | Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:03:11 -0500 |
| References | <roy-666C26.09193920122013@news.panix.com> <l9399l$dg0$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.4462.1387614224.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-246789.10104821122013@news.panix.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | pool-173-75-254-207.phlapa.fios.verizon.net |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <roy-246789.10104821122013@news.panix.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4486.1387663424.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 38 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1387663424 news.xs4all.nl 2977 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59998 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:62515 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 12/21/2013 10:10 AM, Roy Smith wrote: > On the last large C++ project I worked on, we decided (i.e. obeyed a > corporate mandate) to start using Coverity's static analysis tool on our > 15 year old codebase. I learned a few things about static analysis then. CPython was about that old when Coverity started giving us reports on the C part of CPython (about 400000 loc). CPython is now essentially free of errors detected by Coverity. > 1) It finds bugs you would never find yourself. Coverity apparently found several for CPython. > 2) If your code does tricky things, you can fool the static analyzer, > leading to false positives. One can define code patterns that are false positives, to silence such reports. > Presumably, it also leads to false > negatives, but you don't know about those :-( We use unit tests to find logic bugs ;-). > 3) If you're going to use static analysis, probably the best way is to > start using it from day one. Trying to duct-tape a static analysis step > into your development process for a legacy codebase is probably more > effort than it's worth. Some of the C coders on the development team thought it *was* for CPython. The fact that CPython has been compiled for, say, 20 different systems may have meant that it already depended less on 'implementation-defined' behavior. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why Python is like C++ Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-20 09:19 -0500
Re: Why Python is like C++ Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-12-20 19:46 +0200
Re: Why Python is like C++ Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-21 10:44 +1300
Re: Why Python is like C++ Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-12-20 22:25 -0700
Re: Why Python is like C++ Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-21 21:06 +1300
Re: Why Python is like C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-21 19:17 +1100
Re: Why Python is like C++ Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2013-12-21 11:19 +0100
Re: Why Python is like C++ Tim Chase <tim@thechases.com> - 2013-12-21 08:52 -0600
Re: Why Python is like C++ Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-22 13:17 +1300
Re: Why Python is like C++ Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-12-21 08:43 -0600
Re: Why Python is like C++ Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-21 10:59 -0500
Re: Why Python is like C++ Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-12-21 10:29 -0600
Re: Why Python is like C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-22 06:04 +1100
Re: Why Python is like C++ Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-22 13:27 +1300
Re: Why Python is like C++ Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-22 13:14 +1300
Re: Why Python is like C++ Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-12-21 08:46 -0700
Re: Why Python is like C++ Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-22 13:36 +1300
Re: Why Python is like C++ Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-21 05:34 +0000
Re: Why Python is like C++ Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-21 21:09 +1300
Re: Why Python is like C++ Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-21 08:22 +0000
Re: Why Python is like C++ Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-21 11:37 +0000
Re: Why Python is like C++ Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-21 12:12 +0000
Re: Why Python is like C++ Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-12-21 00:18 -0800
Re: Why Python is like C++ Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-21 11:51 +0000
Re: Why Python is like C++ Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-21 10:10 -0500
Re: Why Python is like C++ Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-12-21 17:03 -0500
Re: Why Python is like C++ Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-21 17:28 -0500
Re: Why Python is like C++ Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-12-21 19:20 -0500
Re: Why Python is like C++ Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-21 08:42 +0000
Re: Why Python is like C++ Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-12-21 14:05 -0500
csiph-web