Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #21290
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!news.mixmin.net!hq-usenetpeers.eweka.nl!81.171.88.250.MISMATCH!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <johnjsal@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.013 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'correspond': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'basic,': 0.09; 'hierarchical': 0.09; 'manipulate': 0.09; 'received:10.50': 0.09; 'tags,': 0.09; 'output': 0.10; 'meaningful': 0.13; 'parser,': 0.16; 'res': 0.16; 'simplest': 0.16; 'subject:expression': 0.16; 'subject:regular': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'looked': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.18; 'cheers,': 0.20; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.21; 'trying': 0.21; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.21; 'received:mail- iy0-f174.google.com': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; '(or': 0.22; 'converts': 0.23; 'thanks.': 0.24; 'extract': 0.24; 'structure': 0.26; 'cc:2**0': 0.26; 'figure': 0.26; "i'm": 0.28; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.29; 'alternatives': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'pm,': 0.29; 'kelly': 0.30; 'use?': 0.30; 'pretty': 0.31; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'actually': 0.31; 'sufficient': 0.32; 'yet': 0.32; 'actual': 0.32; 'tue,': 0.32; 'idea': 0.32; 'there': 0.33; "won't": 0.33; 'anything': 0.34; 'subject:What': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'another': 0.37; 'difference': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'enough': 0.38; 'uses': 0.38; 'allows': 0.38; 'could': 0.38; 'should': 0.38; 'data': 0.38; 'easier': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.39; 'called': 0.40; 'might': 0.40; 'john': 0.61; 'header:Received:6': 0.61; 'simple': 0.61; 'your': 0.61; 'forward': 0.63; 'choose': 0.64; 'guarantee': 0.66; 'subject:best': 0.67; 'beautiful': 0.71; 'news,': 0.73; 'subject:this': 0.74; 'stream': 0.77; 'messed': 0.84; 'subject:write': 0.84; 'that)': 0.84; 'from.': 0.93 |
| Received-SPF | pass (google.com: domain of johnjsal@gmail.com designates 10.50.153.234 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.153.234; |
| Authentication-Results | mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of johnjsal@gmail.com designates 10.50.153.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=johnjsal@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=johnjsal@gmail.com |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IL+TQ65EkO0Gva0C4P70Wttz9bju5QyfFVPrrbFZLp8=; b=v1vJN4M83JwgFw2rB91PX4Zqr50eFl0CS7Cf2f/9OAZX3H4dMXd7mPAMPeNtGCFVG7 bKaYKOobFdwPd2Ei+05ZH+Bi+hArSVejghAj0LSvn3xK81u9esilou4yPzYH1hPR0noJ XLdHnFaUYqnnP2D76UwYpfeIKByVpmWyginRva6eRDUgyD5UhvwBsLNURCGkcrpr1ODl R4i00cJbI4J4s0hRl7YiMTycL5YUO0Ehw+KLNPI4WqshiIqkQcIQVK5v0A/stZp3tYMH TPGwLFKHRPP9RnRnDmfClXpHrKASEJ8tUvvplmh49fnc4DEtRcR3ia63FqbX01CoxoTA O3HQ== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <CALwzid=H=kk++fGt6MJUHHek_4Qfa_jNo6H0mjmZ_aOf99_8zg@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <12783654.1174.1331073814011.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yner4> <mailman.442.1331074333.3037.python-list@python.org> <mailman.443.1331074966.3037.python-list@python.org> <28285433.1413.1331075139309.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynbq18> <CALwzid=H=kk++fGt6MJUHHek_4Qfa_jNo6H0mjmZ_aOf99_8zg@mail.gmail.com> |
| From | John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> |
| Date | Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:39:42 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? |
| To | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.448.1331077211.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 28 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1331077211 news.xs4all.nl 6913 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55805 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:21290 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Thanks. I'm thinking the choice might be between lxml and Beautiful Soup, but since BS uses lxml as a parser, I'm trying to figure out the difference between them. I don't necessarily need the simplest (html.parser), but I want to choose one that is simple enough yet powerful enough that I won't have to learn another method later. On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:05 PM, John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Anything that allows me NOT to use REs is welcome news, so I look forward to learning about something new! :) >> >> I should ask though...are there alternatives already bundled with Python that I could use? Now that you mention it, I remember something called HTMLParser (or something like that) and I have no idea why I never looked into that before I messed with REs. > > HTMLParser is pretty basic, although it may be sufficient for your > needs. It just converts an html document into a stream of start tags, > end tags, and text, with no guarantee that the tags will actually > correspond in any meaningful way. lxml can be used to output an > actual hierarchical structure that may be easier to manipulate and > extract data from. > > Cheers, > Ian
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 14:43 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-03-06 14:52 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:02 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:05 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:25 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:33 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:33 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 16:35 -0700
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 17:39 -0600
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-03-06 20:04 -0500
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:05 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-06 23:44 +0000
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:57 -0800
RE: What's the best way to write this regular expression? "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-03-07 00:04 +0000
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-03-06 20:06 -0500
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:02 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-03-06 20:26 -0500
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 23:02 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-07 02:36 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 12:39 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 14:01 -0700
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 15:11 -0600
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 19:38 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 19:52 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2012-03-07 16:27 -0500
RE: What's the best way to write this regular expression? "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-03-07 21:31 +0000
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 14:34 -0700
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 15:44 -0600
Re: RE: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> - 2012-03-07 16:02 -0600
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 23:26 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 16:03 +1100
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 23:25 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 13:33 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 13:40 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 13:52 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-03-08 21:54 +0000
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-03-08 17:19 -0500
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 16:25 -0600
RE: What's the best way to write this regular expression? "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-03-08 23:02 +0000
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-03-08 18:23 -0500
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-03-08 14:52 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? jkn <jkn_gg@nicorp.f9.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 02:45 -0800
csiph-web