Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #62501
| From | Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? |
| Date | 2013-12-21 11:54 -0500 |
| Organization | IISS Elusive Unicorn |
| References | <af844bcf-ed55-42da-8a9f-b8270dcc4028@googlegroups.com> <c2a5eae4-5caa-4ca1-b66d-5bbeb1edd261@googlegroups.com> <mailman.4437.1387555241.18130.python-list@python.org> <52b59081$0$6599$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4475.1387644850.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 21 Dec 2013 12:58:41 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> declaimed the following:
>On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:00:22 +0000, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
>> On 20/12/2013 15:34, rusi wrote:
>
>>> You are also assuming that the two horizontal lines sometimes called
>>> 'equals' have something to do with something called by the same name in
>>> math -- equations
>>>
>>>
>> A good point. Shall I write a PEP asking for a language change which
>> requires that that stupid = sign is replaced by a keyword reading
>> something like
>> thenameonthelefthandsideisassignedtheobjectontherighthandside ?
>
>That's an excellent idea, and I look forward to reading the PEP.
-1 vote... It still has the problematic "assigned" term...
I'd suggest:
thefullyqualifiednameontheleftafteranysubexpressionshavebeenevaluatedisattachedtotheobjectresultingfromevaluationoftheexpressionontheright
(heh, the spell-checker suggests that
"thefullyqualifiednameontheleftafteranysubexpressionshavebeenevaluatedisattachedt"
should be replaced with "textually")
--
Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN
wlfraed@ix.netcom.com HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Newbie question. Are those different objects ? dec135@msn.com - 2013-12-20 07:16 -0800
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? random832@fastmail.us - 2013-12-20 10:24 -0500
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-20 07:34 -0800
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-20 16:00 +0000
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-20 09:10 -0800
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-20 17:29 +0000
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@gmail.com> - 2013-12-20 09:59 -0800
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-21 10:56 +1300
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-23 08:19 +0000
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-21 12:58 +0000
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-12-21 11:54 -0500
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-22 05:39 +1100
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-21 19:17 +0000
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2013-12-23 11:31 +1000
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? Travis Griggs <travisgriggs@gmail.com> - 2013-12-20 10:24 -0800
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? bob gailer <bgailer@gmail.com> - 2013-12-20 12:02 -0500
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? rurpy@yahoo.com - 2013-12-20 10:06 -0800
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-12-20 16:56 -0500
Re: Newbie question. Are those different objects ? Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-12-21 14:08 -0500
csiph-web