Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #21289
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.019 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'correspond': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'basic,': 0.09; 'hierarchical': 0.09; 'manipulate': 0.09; 'received:mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com': 0.09; 'tags,': 0.09; 'output': 0.10; 'meaningful': 0.13; 'res': 0.16; 'subject:expression': 0.16; 'subject:regular': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'looked': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cheers,': 0.20; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.22; '(or': 0.22; 'converts': 0.23; 'extract': 0.24; 'structure': 0.26; 'cc:2**0': 0.26; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.29; 'alternatives': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'pm,': 0.29; 'use?': 0.30; 'pretty': 0.31; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'actually': 0.31; 'received:209.85.215.46': 0.32; 'sufficient': 0.32; 'actual': 0.32; 'tue,': 0.32; 'idea': 0.32; 'there': 0.33; 'anything': 0.34; 'subject:What': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'allows': 0.38; 'could': 0.38; 'should': 0.38; 'data': 0.38; 'easier': 0.38; 'received:209.85.215': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'called': 0.40; 'john': 0.61; 'header:Received:6': 0.61; 'your': 0.61; 'forward': 0.63; 'guarantee': 0.66; 'subject:best': 0.67; 'news,': 0.73; 'subject:this': 0.74; 'stream': 0.77; 'messed': 0.84; 'subject:write': 0.84; 'that)': 0.84; 'from.': 0.93 |
| Received-SPF | pass (google.com: domain of ian.g.kelly@gmail.com designates 10.112.85.199 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.112.85.199; |
| Authentication-Results | mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ian.g.kelly@gmail.com designates 10.112.85.199 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ian.g.kelly@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=ian.g.kelly@gmail.com |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=R4eq0gGEIF3/WvsHn8RshWRGUaoKLQWjQn/iIL0edRk=; b=Ex46qJfSgNenG8w8kmOHQCe/XYogfxfzS2Hoa8ibNu8mf3xm9eBgJzqCk3NA6ECfPF j1ocgIsCeaCQLA/2udP4l9uhr/ru2OUMtZEK6VSjrcRzZGRET50zAjEQ0OyW6XYJ46pP mMnvu0F+qfjF+Q4+pL3BVYy8JZIWXqbZikkvMuU3hdDeniPZEwnj3uOsjMEExhZpR8Gm vII7vkgBye8JqLeWiIVkjC1VsJBdgM/c/ikbcZr0qw1jjrSkt4bg6sFFe+PXxhaiRgl+ zsPnqM3qhbvACvYP2aB179p6fVObXOCh7w3Ex3/P5VIaY6sQbYtfsz7Ls/wEAbLuF+4a e6iA== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <28285433.1413.1331075139309.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynbq18> |
| References | <12783654.1174.1331073814011.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yner4> <mailman.442.1331074333.3037.python-list@python.org> <mailman.443.1331074966.3037.python-list@python.org> <28285433.1413.1331075139309.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynbq18> |
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | Tue, 6 Mar 2012 16:35:32 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? |
| To | John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.447.1331076963.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 14 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1331076963 news.xs4all.nl 6985 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50640 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:21289 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:05 PM, John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> wrote: >> Anything that allows me NOT to use REs is welcome news, so I look forward to learning about something new! :) > > I should ask though...are there alternatives already bundled with Python that I could use? Now that you mention it, I remember something called HTMLParser (or something like that) and I have no idea why I never looked into that before I messed with REs. HTMLParser is pretty basic, although it may be sufficient for your needs. It just converts an html document into a stream of start tags, end tags, and text, with no guarantee that the tags will actually correspond in any meaningful way. lxml can be used to output an actual hierarchical structure that may be easier to manipulate and extract data from. Cheers, Ian
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 14:43 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-03-06 14:52 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:02 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:05 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:25 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:33 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:33 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 16:35 -0700
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 17:39 -0600
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-03-06 20:04 -0500
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:05 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-06 23:44 +0000
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:57 -0800
RE: What's the best way to write this regular expression? "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-03-07 00:04 +0000
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-03-06 20:06 -0500
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 15:02 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-03-06 20:26 -0500
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 23:02 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-07 02:36 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 12:39 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 14:01 -0700
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 15:11 -0600
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 19:38 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 19:52 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2012-03-07 16:27 -0500
RE: What's the best way to write this regular expression? "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-03-07 21:31 +0000
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 14:34 -0700
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 15:44 -0600
Re: RE: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> - 2012-03-07 16:02 -0600
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 23:26 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 16:03 +1100
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 23:25 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 13:33 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 13:40 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 13:52 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-03-08 21:54 +0000
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-03-08 17:19 -0500
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 16:25 -0600
RE: What's the best way to write this regular expression? "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-03-08 23:02 +0000
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-03-08 18:23 -0500
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-03-08 14:52 -0800
Re: What's the best way to write this regular expression? jkn <jkn_gg@nicorp.f9.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 02:45 -0800
csiph-web