Re: Inner workings of this Python feature: Can a Python data structure reference itself?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.061
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.88; 'S': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'cpython': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'lst': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'cleaned': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'sat,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'creating': 0.23; 'necessary.': 0.24; "shouldn't": 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'tim': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'chase': 0.31; 'advice': 0.35; 'except': 0.35; 'objects': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'version': 0.36; 'subject:data': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'major': 0.40; 'manually': 0.60; 'subject:Can': 0.60; 'break': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'such': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'believe': 0.68; 'containing': 0.69; 'guaranteed': 0.75; 'subject:this': 0.83; '2015': 0.84; '3.4': 0.84
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=xAE0ttSGLpDK/SCDnRaqf9EOut+gOy250ihjkgCyhio=; b=Swttbic30sQ1QK/y7XRPXqI7iRPBC8pr/PzjdhIFw31cEm/4IhlYNyAT6lIbWqod0h OBSzs8RtC0bGfl/wRjT97VD7f4yV0SxKDDJZcY1oNdtmVLbadgCoQPGpFTnDf7mdjjqW Fx508OtfC4FARRxzW+ewnOA1T+cwZHPQrG78pTs6BRTjBRBfJp6BFk//fZy4l+gnpLKX NabGnt35sQm7+i5lZjDfz+IC1fmMHDEJH/7lSuPXSEko3M+UcpzzjKYvgDBGQ8pmRfmD uAUm4+njPjOOkuAn6QdGokzXg+bcEOfslmVVrAbsnnhtfFxpEgIaOSwvFofip75Yeak2 4dqA==
X-Received	by 10.107.136.89 with SMTP id k86mr19907145iod.63.1430628221645; Sat, 02 May 2015 21:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version	1.0
In-Reply-To	<20150502151723.3a36e33b@bigbox.christie.dr>
References	<387ac520-9da3-411a-a3b8-b326e1e8a2c0@googlegroups.com> <20150502151723.3a36e33b@bigbox.christie.dr>
From	Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date	Sat, 2 May 2015 22:43:01 -0600
Subject	Re: Inner workings of this Python feature: Can a Python data structure reference itself?
To	Python <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.20+
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.44.1430628229.12865.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	16
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1430628229 news.xs4all.nl 2880 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39828
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:89827

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> wrote:
> If you know that you're creating such cyclical structures, it's best
> to manually unlink them before freeing them:
>
>   lst = []
>   lst.append(lst) # create the cycle
>   lst[:] = []   # break the cycle
>   # or lst.remove(lst) # though this takes more care
>   del lst

In general, this shouldn't be necessary. I believe that reference
cycles are guaranteed to be cleaned up in all major implementations of
Python, except that in CPython prior to version 3.4 reference cycles
containing objects with finalizers would not be collected. So the
better advice would be "don't use finalizers in reference cycles if
you need compatibility with Python 3.3 or earlier."

Thread

csiph-web