Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #62357
| Date | 2013-12-18 20:06 -0600 |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> |
| Subject | Re: Is it more CPU-efficient to read/write config file or read/write sqlite database? |
| References | (1 earlier) <20131218103148.GA2728@cskk.homeip.net> <mailman.4344.1387363803.18130.python-list@python.org> <iln3b99rqvioro188l8d7tivtluhse44mt@4ax.com> <mailman.4368.1387389583.18130.python-list@python.org> <iva4b9d7ip3u3g75kamttpl81c39hvehu0@4ax.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4395.1387418726.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 2013-12-18 15:14, dick wrote: >>However, my understanding is that they have a small on-drive >>battery/capacitor that stores sufficient energy for the cached >>write(s) to complete in the event the system's power abruptly cuts >>off. >> >>Granted, this is purely hearsay, as it's been a long time since I >>mucked around with hardware much. >> > The drives may have something like that now, but they didn't have > any power down flush capability when I was working for WD. Of > course, that was 15 years ago... <old_fart> Indeed, I certainly remember launching park.exe on my DOS & Win95 machines to flush write-caches and park the heads in preparation of power-down. </old_fart> I recall being told by multiple hardware professionals since 2000 that such wasn't needed any more. I don't have reason to doubt them, especially as I no longer see references to parking heads in any OS or add-on utility. At least on linux (possibly the BSDs too), one can specify that particular mounts are done with the "sync" option to force all writes to make it to the metal/EEPROM before returning, though I don't think this is the default. -tkc
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Is it more CPU-efficient to read/write config file or read/write sqlite database? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-18 21:50 +1100
Re: Is it more CPU-efficient to read/write config file or read/write sqlite database? dick <encore1@cox.net> - 2013-12-18 09:49 -0800
Re: Is it more CPU-efficient to read/write config file or read/write sqlite database? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-12-18 12:00 -0600
Re: Is it more CPU-efficient to read/write config file or read/write sqlite database? dick <encore1@cox.net> - 2013-12-18 15:14 -0800
Re: Is it more CPU-efficient to read/write config file or read/write sqlite database? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-12-18 19:31 -0500
Re: Is it more CPU-efficient to read/write config file or read/write sqlite database? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-19 11:56 +1100
Re: Is it more CPU-efficient to read/write config file or read/write sqlite database? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-12-18 20:06 -0600
csiph-web