Re: uPy Unicode [was Re: Instead of deciding between Python or Lisp blah blah blah]

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'cpython': 0.05; 'that?': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'incompatible': 0.07; 'think,': 0.07; 'utf-8': 0.07; 'string': 0.09; 'okay': 0.09; 'subject: [': 0.09; 'url:github': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'missed': 0.12; 'accepting': 0.14; 'character.': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'iterating': 0.16; 'mandate': 0.16; 'semantics': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:Unicode': 0.16; 'subject:between': 0.16; 'subscripting': 0.16; 'url:issues': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'discussion': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; "python's": 0.19; '(the': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; "aren't": 0.24; 'bytes': 0.24; 'unicode': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'changes,': 0.26; 'tracker': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'character': 0.29; 'characters': 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; '(on': 0.31; '13,': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'question:': 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'yield': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; 'requirements': 0.37; 'problems': 0.38; 'subject:]': 0.38; 'issue': 0.38; 'length': 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'skip:n 10': 0.64; 'become': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'finally': 0.65; 'due': 0.66; 'biggest': 0.67; 'detail.': 0.68; 'overall': 0.69; '2015': 0.84; 'python-dev': 0.84; 'url:657': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92; 'imagine': 0.93
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=ddnb4thNkAM3KwMWkNb8OCIT0negOfaQmjmY10vgz9Y=; b=uJh16xBK/xLmqTvZpmdtbzJ4TZIzEoLXCCSp2vpU9KDonzAgXJLst+Vp8lkpz1NpoI hrlhGFxZVqxqig5dn+cfJEAJTiKPibq8MqZ1pk7yeQx58dbKvQ5VI3NW04ELRtzG8Hbs MSlXKj2vRaXH03we2vsx9yGSQta41vFyGVJ0319Q9iHY4EltFGPHdpEx2C9+40qIn+Jz d8eejDyXRjV4KUTCOmlV4xupn3VOyDUvhBpH7P5LXX372bsdvrxlmwN+HHG96iH1v879 77zLZIXbUu3GPZKowS6dPhstTizJ+AYjDBgM/mLnfv3xIknDCw2/MZNfpkB6iiVjrCjb cLFA==
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Received	by 10.107.134.206 with SMTP id q75mr24134637ioi.27.1431494012780; Tue, 12 May 2015 22:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To	<5552a774$0$12993$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
References	<02dba7aa-8466-4937-a8d8-82ffd03e5568@googlegroups.com> <87wq0gyvyr.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <mailman.333.1431308306.12865.python-list@python.org> <ed1b5d2c-7d29-4102-b310-ee544cf033a3@googlegroups.com> <55515f9d$0$12987$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <569169cf-d232-48c0-bd49-91090e9c0ddb@googlegroups.com> <mitbph$2sq$3@dont-email.me> <complexity-20150512191339@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <mailman.406.1431451597.12865.python-list@python.org> <5552a774$0$12993$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Date	Wed, 13 May 2015 15:13:32 +1000
Subject	Re: uPy Unicode [was Re: Instead of deciding between Python or Lisp blah blah blah]
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Cc	"python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.20+
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.430.1431494021.12865.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	39
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1431494021 news.xs4all.nl 2955 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:56509
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:90527

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2015 03:26 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> back when MicroPython was debating the implementation of Unicode
>> strings, there was a lengthy discussion on python-dev about whether
>> it's okay for string subscripting to be O(n) instead of O(1), and the
>> final decision was that yes, that's an implementation detail. (UTF-8
>> internal string representation, so iterating over a string would still
>> yield characters in overall O(n), but iterating up to the string's
>> length and subscripting for each character would become O(n*n) on
>> uPy.)
>
> o_O
>
> Got a link to that? I must have missed it.

Linking to python-dev is a bit fiddly and/or unstable due to URL
changes, plus the discussion there was pretty long and rambly.
Probably the best I can do is point you to the tracker issue where I
opened the original question:

https://github.com/micropython/micropython/issues/657

(The biggest issue was that uPy was, at the time, fundamentally
incompatible with Python's stipulated semantics - imagine all the
problems of a narrow build of CPython <3.3, only more frequent because
it's actually UTF-8.)

It was finally decided, I think, that Python-the-language didn't
actually mandate O(1) indexing, meaning that a microcontroller (on
which strings aren't going to be gigantic anyway) is welcome to use a
UTF-8 internal representation, with "Hello, world"[4] required to scan
across and count non-continuation bytes to find the right character.
Whether or not uPy actually ended up accepting the requirements of
proper Unicode support I don't know, as I'm no longer involved with
the project.

ChrisA

Thread

csiph-web