Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #18231

Re: mutually exclusive arguments to a constructor

Show all headers | View raw

> Suppose I'm creating a class that represents a bearing or azimuth,
> created either from a string of traditional bearing notation
> ("N24d30mE") or from a number indicating the angle in degrees as
> usually measured in trigonometry (65.5, measured counter-clockwise
> from the x-axis).  The class will have methods to return the same
> bearing in various formats.
>
> In Java, I would write two constructors, one taking a single String
> argument and one taking a single Double argument.  But in Python, a
> class can have only one __init__ method, although it can have a lot of
> optional arguments with default values.  What's the correct way to
> deal with a situation like the one I've outlined above?

Similar to other answers already posted:


#!/usr/bin/env python
class azimuth:
    def __init__(self, bearing, heading):
        self.bearing = bearing
        self.heading = heading
        if not bearing:
            self.bearing = 30.5 # or, realistically, a calculation
based on the heading
        if not heading:
            self.heading = "N..." # or, realistically, a calculation
based on the bearing
    @staticmethod
    def getBearingInstance(bearing):
        return azimuth(bearing, None)
    @staticmethod
    def getHeadingInstance(heading):
        return azimuth(None, heading)

azimuth1 = azimuth.getBearingInstance("N24d30mE")
print azimuth1.heading

azimuth2 = azimuth.getHeadingInstance(30)
print azimuth2.bearing

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

mutually exclusive arguments to a constructor Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2011-12-30 20:40 +0000
  Re: mutually exclusive arguments to a constructor "Günther Dietrich" <gd.usenet@spamfence.net> - 2011-12-30 22:00 +0100
    Re: mutually exclusive arguments to a constructor Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2011-12-31 20:55 +0000
  Re: mutually exclusive arguments to a constructor Mel Wilson <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-12-30 16:08 -0500
  Re: mutually exclusive arguments to a constructor Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> - 2011-12-30 21:14 +0000
  Re: mutually exclusive arguments to a constructor Jason Friedman <jason@powerpull.net> - 2011-12-30 21:18 +0000
    Re: mutually exclusive arguments to a constructor Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-30 22:21 +0000
  Re: mutually exclusive arguments to a constructor Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-30 22:13 +0000
  Re: mutually exclusive arguments to a constructor Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-12-30 18:24 -0500
    Re: mutually exclusive arguments to a constructor Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-31 10:36 +1100
      Re: mutually exclusive arguments to a constructor Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-12-30 18:39 -0500
        Re: mutually exclusive arguments to a constructor Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-31 10:47 +1100
    Re: mutually exclusive arguments to a constructor Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2011-12-31 20:59 +0000

csiph-web