Groups > comp.lang.python > #61929

Re: a Python Static Analyzer

From	Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject	Re: a Python Static Analyzer
Date	2013-12-15 02:56 +0000
References	<6d2c938b-dd66-4de6-8422-aaa55fcc2e1e@googlegroups.com> <CAGGBd_rm9Woo+dTxdrp-60TDSQG9unWwAEjy15u-QEtr7+ycag@mail.gmail.com> <CAMZYqRRKFe0-8Sdd4qgXHL_E2++JPOFTUcKJSF=SG_z3JHHXug@mail.gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.4134.1387076188.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 15/12/2013 02:36, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Where does PySonar2 sit in the spectrum from pylint
>> (thorough/pedantic) to pyflakes (relaxed/few-false-positives)?
>>
>> I use pylint and pyflakes a lot, and I've heard that PyChecker sits in
>> between them on this axis.
>
> My impression is that PyChecker has been abandoned.
> The last commit in its SourceForge CVS repo is from 2008, and `pip
> install PyChecker` fails.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>

I've no idea as to the real status of Pyflakes so hopefully this 
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/code-quality/2013-December/000189.html 
is just a temporary hickup.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask 
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

a Python Static Analyzer arie.lakeman@gmail.com - 2013-12-14 16:35 -0800
  Re: a Python Static Analyzer Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-12-14 17:31 -0800
  Re: a Python Static Analyzer Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2013-12-14 18:36 -0800
    Re: a Python Static Analyzer arie.lakeman@gmail.com - 2013-12-15 12:25 -0800
      Re: a Python Static Analyzer Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-15 21:00 +0000
  Re: a Python Static Analyzer Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-15 02:56 +0000

csiph-web