Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #49578
| Date | 2013-07-01 11:29 -0700 |
|---|---|
| From | Tobiah <tshepard@rcsreg.com> |
| Subject | PYTHONPATH and module names |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4074.1372703671.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
So today, I created a file called 'formatter.py', and my program broke. It turned out that I was also import 'gluon' from web2py, which in turn, somewhere, imported the regular python formatter.py with which I was not familiar. So the question is: Does one simply always have to be knowledgeable about existing python library names, or is having '.' in the python path just a bad idea? Is there a way, not having '.' in the path to explicitly specify the current directory? Something analogous to import ./foo ? Thanks, Tobiah
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
PYTHONPATH and module names Tobiah <tshepard@rcsreg.com> - 2013-07-01 11:29 -0700
Re: PYTHONPATH and module names rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 11:39 -0700
Re: PYTHONPATH and module names Tobiah <toby@tobiah.org> - 2013-07-01 12:54 -0700
Re: PYTHONPATH and module names rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 14:38 -0700
Re: PYTHONPATH and module names Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-01 22:05 +0000
Re: PYTHONPATH and module names Lele Gaifax <lele@metapensiero.it> - 2013-07-02 07:30 +0200
Re: PYTHONPATH and module names Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 23:08 +0100
Re: PYTHONPATH and module names "SpaghettiToastBook ." <spaghettitoastbook@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 16:40 -0400
csiph-web