Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #42352
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-30 15:06 -0700 |
| References | (3 earlier) <mailman.3857.1364445382.2939.python-list@python.org> <f160e316-e2f6-4314-827e-9d48007f7f70@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3946.1364556269.2939.python-list@python.org> <17da5afc-7a9b-40ea-a544-6012dfeef3ce@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3970.1364595086.2939.python-list@python.org> |
| Subject | Re: Sudoku |
| From | Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4006.1364681188.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Saturday, March 30, 2013 8:41:08 AM UTC+10:30, Dave Angel wrote: > On 03/29/2013 05:47 PM, Eric Parry wrote: > > > > > >> <SNIP> > > >> > > > That explains why the program keeps running after a solution is found. > > > > A recursive function can be designed to find all solutions, in which > > case it would (as you say) keep running. > > > > The function you posted in the first place uses exit() to avoid keeping > > running. It stops as soon as a solution is found. > > > > Sometimes a problem cannot be solved in the number of stack entries > > supplied by Python. So even though such a function will terminate, it > > may crash first if the problem is too big. Example, the factorial > > problem I described earlier, if you pass it 2000 as a parameter. If > > this is a problem, one can tell the Python to give you more stack entries. > > > > Given a 9x9 matrix, and at least some of them filled in, the maximum > > depth your code can use is less than 81. So it won't get a stack > > overflow in any implementation of Python I've seen. Perhaps in an 8051. > > > > Sometimes a bug in such a function will cause it to run indefinitely, > > and/or to overflow the stack. I don't see such a bug in this function. > > > > > > -- > > DaveA The exit() did not work. I replaced it with return = 0, and that does work. Eric.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-26 22:44 -0700
Re: Sudoku Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2013-03-27 08:58 +0100
Re: Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-27 20:00 -0700
Re: Sudoku Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-03-28 00:36 -0400
Re: Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-28 15:11 -0700
Re: Sudoku Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-03-28 19:28 -0400
Re: Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-28 22:07 -0700
Re: Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-28 22:07 -0700
Re: Sudoku Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-03-29 09:45 +1100
Re: Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-29 14:47 -0700
Re: Sudoku Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-03-29 18:11 -0400
Re: Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-30 15:06 -0700
Re: Sudoku Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-03-30 19:15 -0400
Re: Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-31 15:03 -0700
Re: Sudoku Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-03-31 18:34 -0400
Re: Sudoku Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> - 2013-03-31 23:59 +0100
Re: Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-31 15:03 -0700
Re: Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-31 15:27 -0700
Re: Sudoku Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-01 09:35 +1100
Re: Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-31 20:58 -0700
Re: Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-31 15:27 -0700
Re: Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-30 15:06 -0700
Re: Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-29 14:47 -0700
Re: Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-28 15:11 -0700
Re: Sudoku Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr> - 2013-03-27 09:49 +0100
Re: Sudoku Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-03-27 05:38 -0400
Re: Sudoku Eric Parry <joan4eric@gmail.com> - 2013-03-27 19:49 -0700
csiph-web