Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #105694

Re: Effects of caching frequently used objects, was Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Effects of caching frequently used objects, was Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python
Date Fri, 25 Mar 2016 09:45:10 -0700
Lines 52
Message-ID <mailman.4.1458924289.28225.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <nb6aqh$dp5$1@ger.gmane.org> <DUB123-W22AD13A14B7564949220F683830@phx.gbl>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de PXN/az9m43tK8/ssXupwBwFsalpHZEDVq9hAr54ZOPag==
Return-Path <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'true,': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'none,': 0.05; 'one?': 0.05; 'important,': 0.07; 'enum': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'none.': 0.09; 'objects.': 0.09; 'variables,': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'argument': 0.15; 'subject: \n ': 0.15; '"is"': 0.16; "(it's": 0.16; ':))': 0.16; 'ellipsis': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'singleton': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; "shouldn't": 0.18; '>>>': 0.20; 'assign': 0.22; 'names.': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; '(such': 0.27; 'correct': 0.28; 'consistency': 0.29; 'expose': 0.29; 'party,': 0.29; '~ethan~': 0.29; 'objects': 0.29; 'somebody': 0.30; 'another': 0.32; 'etc.)': 0.32; 'getting': 0.33; 'false': 0.35; 'identity': 0.35; 'according': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'late': 0.38; 'names': 0.38; 'someone': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'where': 0.40; 'behavior': 0.61; 'subject: ': 0.61; 'no.': 0.62; 'back': 0.62; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'member,': 0.67
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
In-Reply-To <DUB123-W22AD13A14B7564949220F683830@phx.gbl>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.21
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:105694

Show key headers only | View raw


On 03/25/2016 06:03 AM, Albert-Jan Roskam wrote:
 > Somebody wrote:
 >> Somebody else wrote:

>>> I know Python does not have variables, but names.
>>> Multiple names cant then be bound to the same objects.
>>>
>>> So this behavior
>>>
>>>--> b = 234
>>>--> v = 234
>>>--> b is v
>>> True
>>>
>>> according to the above that is ok
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But where is the consistency ? if I try :
>>>
>>>--> v = 890
>>>--> w = 890
>>>--> v is w
>>> False
>>>
>>> It is a little difficult to explain this behavior to a newcommer in Python
>>>
>>> Can someone give me the right argument to expose ?
>>
>> You should not bother with object identity for objects other than None.

No.  The correct answer is: if identity is important either ensure the 
object you are getting back is a singleton (such as None, True, an Enum 
member, etc.) or you assign one name from another name:

--> b = 234
--> v = b
--> b is v
True
--> v = 890
--> w = v
--> v is w
True

If identity is not important, don't use `is`.

> A little late to the party, but: how about Ellipsis? Shouldn't "is" also be used for that one? (It's rare, I know :))

Ellipsis is a singleton, so `is` is fine.

--
~Ethan~

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Explaining  names  vs variables  in Python Salvatore DI DIO <salvatore.didio@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 00:32 -0800
  Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Jesper K Brogaard <jesper@brogAAaard.eu> - 2016-03-02 10:03 +0100
    Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-02 21:32 +1100
      Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-02 14:34 +0200
        Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:50 +1100
          Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-03-02 15:11 +0200
          Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-02 15:39 +0200
            Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 00:48 +1100
              Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-02 16:11 +0200
                Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 07:08 -0800
                Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-03 04:23 +1100
                Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 09:28 -0800
                Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-02 20:12 +0200
                Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-03 12:52 +1100
                Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 09:03 -0800
                Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 12:53 -0700
                Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-02 21:49 +0000
                Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-03 13:05 +1100
                Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-03 16:09 +0000
                Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 08:52 +1100
                Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 17:23 -0800
                Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-02 22:51 +0000
              Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-03 04:10 +1100
  Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-03-02 10:08 +0100
  Effects of caching frequently used objects, was Re: Explaining  names  vs variables  in Python Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-03-02 10:12 +0100
  Re: Explaining  names  vs variables  in Python Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-03-02 11:35 +0200
    Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 08:13 -0700
      Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-03-02 17:37 +0200
  Re: Explaining  names  vs variables  in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-02 21:16 +1100
  Re: Explaining  names  vs variables  in Python "ast" <nomail@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 11:52 +0100
    Re: Explaining  names  vs variables  in Python Salvatore DI DIO <salvatore.didio@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 02:58 -0800
  Re: Effects of caching frequently used objects, was Re: Explaining  names  vs variables  in Python Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 09:16 -0500
  Re: Explaining  names  vs variables  in Python Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-03-03 04:53 +1100
  RE: Effects of caching frequently used objects, was Re: Explaining names  vs variables  in Python Albert-Jan Roskam <sjeik_appie@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-25 13:03 +0000
  Re: Effects of caching frequently used objects, was Re: Explaining names vs variables in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 00:22 +1100
  Re: Effects of caching frequently used objects, was Re: Explaining names  vs variables  in Python Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-03-25 09:45 -0700

csiph-web