Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #103619
| Path | csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Bug in Python? |
| Date | Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:52:45 +0100 |
| Lines | 26 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4.1456653176.9760.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <56D0CCE9.2000301@mail.de> <CALwzidm+yx=j=+X8bNLWobTJjvXdm0gwq=8=5JhdOa853goJ4g@mail.gmail.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | news.uni-berlin.de YDMu/1ATKIbeYMavA0H1jA+w046bTHFHxV86U4i201zw== |
| Return-Path | <srkunze@mail.de> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.011 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'assumed': 0.09; 'imported.': 0.09; 'tends': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'python.': 0.11; 'ignore': 0.14; '2016': 0.16; 'ah,': 0.16; 'pymethoddef': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'implementing': 0.18; 'appears': 0.23; 'code.': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'feb': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'module': 0.25; 'fri,': 0.27; 'right.': 0.27; 'operations,': 0.27; 'methods.': 0.29; 'thus,': 0.29; 'that.': 0.30; 'code': 0.30; 'guess': 0.31; 'skip:_ 10': 0.32; 'implement': 0.32; 'closely': 0.33; 'operations.': 0.33; 'rule': 0.33; 'know.': 0.34; 'received:10.0': 0.34; 'best,': 0.35; 'replaced': 0.35; 'comment': 0.35; 'sometimes': 0.35; 'too': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:10': 0.37; 'difference': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'received:de': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'back': 0.62; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'between': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; '26,': 0.72; 'forth': 0.79; 'verifying': 0.84 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mail.de; s=mail201212; t=1456653169; bh=QrK+Nv8mawbY2BurTA3l3oApAy83tSUXn3ksaw1qkwY=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=PqR8GIJyQhSC3RERJ0hktrkVSp1P1KpipjECIcnUW9pNVbOoUFC3UC0qdx22tuDU5 yWvjD+OZXiOWB+0QwHcQzHTAPT9fIZdzQ5P3GSkAXvX7Pns7nFUjeMlvcIkbu4OxOY GtxdmlIlfwUDL4FfLg4YGFVe3UvbxLj5CEOI6/HI= |
| In-Reply-To | <CALwzidm+yx=j=+X8bNLWobTJjvXdm0gwq=8=5JhdOa853goJ4g@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-purgate | clean |
| X-purgate | This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information) |
| X-purgate-type | clean |
| X-purgate-Ad | Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de |
| X-purgate | This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information) |
| X-purgate | clean |
| X-purgate-size | 1029 |
| X-purgate-ID | 154282::1456653168-000018ED-5DAC325A/0/0 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.21rc2 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:103619 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 26.02.2016 23:37, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Sven R. Kunze <srkunze@mail.de> wrote: >> Python sometimes seems not to hop back and forth between C and Python code. > C code as a rule tends to ignore dunder methods. Those are used to > implement Python operations, not C operations. Ah, good to know. >> _siftup(heap, 0) # that's C > Your comment here appears to be incorrect. > > [snip] > > So I would guess that the difference here is because one > implementation is entirely C, and the other implementation is entirely > Python. You are damn right. While implementing xheap and looking at the C implementation, I just assumed that all Python functions would be replaced by when the C module is imported. Furthermore, the C module exports some internal functions (leading _ ) such as _heappop_max. Thus, I assumed this is true for _siftup without verifying it by looking too closely at the PyMethodDef and PyModuleDef structs. Sorry for that. Best, Sven
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Bug in Python? "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2016-02-28 10:52 +0100
csiph-web