Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #87684

Re: Brilliant or insane code?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!bcyclone02.am1.xlned.com!bcyclone02.am1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.003
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'url:pypi': 0.03; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'args': 0.07; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'dan': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'worse': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; 'language.': 0.14; 'chunks': 0.16; 'it;': 0.16; 'iterates': 0.16; 'itertools': 0.16; 'itself,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'recipe': 0.16; 'work."': 0.16; 'weird': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; '(the': 0.22; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; "i've": 0.25; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'url:bugs': 0.29; 'points': 0.29; 'along': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'relies': 0.31; 'says': 0.33; 'url:python': 0.33; 'but': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'detail': 0.37; 'url:library': 0.38; 'skip:[ 10': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'according': 0.40; 'ian': 0.60; 'url:3': 0.61; 'guarantee': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'zip': 0.64; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'mar': 0.68; 'fact,': 0.69; 'url:4': 0.69; 'opinions': 0.70; 'article': 0.77; '"it': 0.84; '2015': 0.84; 'abc': 0.84; 'guaranteed.': 0.84; 'url:posts': 0.84; 'sitting': 0.91
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: Brilliant or insane code?
Date Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:20:12 +0000
References <mailman.507.1426638964.21433.python-list@python.org> <meajh1$hr0$2@dont-email.me> <CALwzid=Y0uQLaPHa8g2fJko9uDJrMLp9-GK7966yXaRkx3TKWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host host-92-24-220-174.ppp.as43234.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
In-Reply-To <CALwzid=Y0uQLaPHa8g2fJko9uDJrMLp9-GK7966yXaRkx3TKWQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.19
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.4.1426692040.10327.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 41
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1426692040 news.xs4all.nl 2856 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45680
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
X-Received-Bytes 4784
X-Received-Body-CRC 2903072587
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:87684

Show key headers only | View raw


On 18/03/2015 14:59, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:35:42 +0000, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>> I've just come across this
>>> http://www.stavros.io/posts/brilliant-or-insane-code/ as a result of
>>> this http://bugs.python.org/issue23695
>>>
>>> Any and all opinions welcomed, I'm chickening out and sitting firmly
>>> on the fence.
>>
>> According to the article itself, "it relies in an implementation detail
>> (the order the zip function iterates over the arrays) to work."  Then
>> again, the article also points to the official docs that says that this
>> implementation detail is guaranteed.
>>
>> So it's no worse than depending on some weird but *documented* corner of
>> the IEEE-754 or POSIX spec.
>
> In fact, this is also a code recipe found in the itertools
> documentation. The official docs don't just guarantee it; they
> *recommend* it.
>
> def grouper(iterable, n, fillvalue=None):
>      "Collect data into fixed-length chunks or blocks"
>      # grouper('ABCDEFG', 3, 'x') --> ABC DEF Gxx"
>      args = [iter(iterable)] * n
>      return zip_longest(*args, fillvalue=fillvalue)
>
> https://docs.python.org/3.4/library/itertools.html
>

Which is available here https://pypi.python.org/pypi/more-itertools 
along with many other goodies.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Brilliant or insane code? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-18 00:35 +0000
  Re: Brilliant or insane code? Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2015-03-18 01:14 +0000
    Re: Brilliant or insane code? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-18 13:25 +1100
      Re: Brilliant or insane code? Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2015-03-18 03:06 +0000
    Re: Brilliant or insane code? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-18 08:59 -0600
    Re: Brilliant or insane code? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-18 15:20 +0000

csiph-web