Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #49429
| Date | 2013-06-29 16:58 +0100 |
|---|---|
| From | MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
| Subject | Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? |
| References | (2 earlier) <51CC42E3.3070508@gmail.com> <mailman.3933.1372348963.3114.python-list@python.org> <51ccc190$0$29999$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.3974.1372469806.3114.python-list@python.org> <51ce708f$0$29999$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3996.1372521698.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 29/06/2013 06:28, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:36:37 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote: > >> On 06/27/2013 03:49 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >>> >>> [rant] >>> I think it is lousy design for a framework like argparse to raise a >>> custom ArgumentError in one part of the code, only to catch it >>> elsewhere and call sys.exit. At the very least, that OUGHT TO BE A >>> CONFIG OPTION, and OFF BY DEFAULT. > > [emphasis added] > >>> Libraries should not call sys.exit, or raise SystemExit. Whether to >>> quit or not is not the library's decision to make, that decision >>> belongs to the application layer. Yes, the application could always >>> catch SystemExit, but it shouldn't have to. >> >> So a library that is explicitly designed to make command-line scripts >> easier and friendlier should quit with a traceback? >> >> Really? > > Yes, really. > [snip] +1 It's the job of argparse to parse the arguments. What should happen if they're invalid is for its caller to decide.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Andrew Berg <robotsondrugs@gmail.com> - 2013-06-27 07:54 -0500
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-06-27 09:08 -0400
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Andrew Berg <robotsondrugs@gmail.com> - 2013-06-27 08:49 -0500
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-06-27 12:02 -0400
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-06-27 22:49 +0000
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-06-28 09:34 +1000
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-06-28 18:36 -0700
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-06-28 21:12 -0700
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-06-29 00:37 -0400
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-06-29 10:12 -0400
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Andrew Berg <robotsondrugs@gmail.com> - 2013-06-29 09:17 -0500
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-06-29 05:28 +0000
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Marcin Szamotulski <mszamot@gmail.com> - 2013-06-29 13:38 +0100
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-06-29 16:58 +0100
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-06-29 12:17 -0700
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Modulok <modulok@gmail.com> - 2013-06-28 19:39 -0600
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Isaac To <isaac.to@gmail.com> - 2013-06-29 12:37 +0800
Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-06-27 20:47 +0100
csiph-web