Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #49354

Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible?

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2013-06-28 09:02, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 27Jun2013 11:50, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
> | If the OP is writing an interactive shell, shouldn't `cmd` be used
> | instead of `argparse`?  argparse is, after all, intended for
> | argument parsing of command line scripts, not for interactive
> work.
> 
> I invoke command line scripts interactively. There's no special
> case here.
> 
> To add to the use case stats, I also subclass cmd and parse
> interactive command lines. I'm beginning to be pleased I'm still
> using Getopt for that instead of feeling I'm lagging behind the
> times.

I too have several small utilities that use a combination of cmd.Cmd,
shlex.shlex(), and command-processing libraries.  However, much like
Cameron's code using getopt, my older code is still using optparse
which gives me the ability to override the error() method's default
sys.exit() behavior and instead raise the exception of your choice.

-tkc

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-06-27 19:22 -0500

csiph-web