Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #49250
| References | <8D03FD9C062D3C9-1864-1CD1D@webmail-m103.sysops.aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-26 12:49 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Is this PEP-able? fwhile |
| From | Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3889.1372247399.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 26 Jun 2013 11:45, <jimjhb@aol.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 9:30:54 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote: > > In my experience the sorts of people who preach "one exit point" are > > also all about defining preconditions and postconditions and proving > > that the postconditions follow from the preconditions. I think that > > the two are linked, because the "one exit point" rule makes those > > sorts of proofs simpler. > > Ah! utopia! > > For every one who knows about pre/post/invariant conditions, there are 10 who follow goto-statement-is-harmful like a religious edict. > > > > I just checked and MISRA-C 2012 now allows gotos in specific, limited circumstances. I think it was the MISRA-C 1998 standard that caused all this trouble. So if MISRA now allows goto, why not Python???? :) > What is the matter? Just use the goto module...
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Is this PEP-able? fwhile Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-26 12:49 +0100
csiph-web