Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #101512

Re: How to remove item from heap efficiently?

Path csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed0.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: How to remove item from heap efficiently?
Date Mon, 11 Jan 2016 21:48:34 -0500
Lines 37
Message-ID <mailman.38.1452566920.13488.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <568EEC40.7070807@mail.de> <CACs7g=Bjccja67M3t4yL+07vO8iAcOB-dF5p2PgqqBwjFmbh=w@mail.gmail.com> <568FE797.6090808@mail.de> <CACs7g=CE7y-aXSdWbN7Fk0J4O4aRwAH5ad7UR1Jhdf9EpNFnug@mail.gmail.com> <5692A795.3070904@mail.de> <CACs7g=AuW8UTVS+SRM-bG=-Ne18W5VLt2CfTDjS0i1cH2qwtpw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de fVq4VSdWwAdgVOWpHAhSqAPGgO0Ss0XKtHTpB6vQoFEA==
Return-Path <cfkaran2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.012
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'subject:How': 0.09; 'jan': 0.11; '2016': 0.16; 'amortized': 0.16; 'heap': 0.16; 'jumping': 0.16; 'o(len(heap))': 0.16; 'operation.': 0.16; 'received:192.168.1.4': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:item': 0.16; 'subject:remove': 0.16; 'useless': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'cc:2**1': 0.22; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'split': 0.23; "haven't": 0.24; 'thanks,': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'operations,': 0.27; 'that.': 0.30; 'becomes': 0.30; 'checks': 0.30; 'though,': 0.32; 'items.': 0.33; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.34; 'add': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'could': 0.35; 'done': 0.35; 'quite': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'method': 0.37; 'thanks': 0.37; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.38; 'means': 0.39; 'subject:from': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'well.': 0.40; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.61; 'more': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'past,': 0.66; 'complexity': 0.84; 'late,': 0.84; 'approached': 0.95
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Y/BqU88X6ClKIYgmD/3QIlSk2y200xCuDv95Ng70nDg=; b=yZTgq6YpKGik04ld2r7qx04gFJi1OBhm5Q1QtMaYKsOlls6xLSPQoOPnhcW9WYkjFU ukEe7D+kpLzXxLfB+KtwfYdmYXRMfXlMoGJFN9StDrND+fXzhOJ6WDsdgrlRBbcLwScP HXFrs4rXKWkVqVyVnNOYJh2dTDowHL0gi4dS8oG0tCYNmqwlvlMLbVyua+6dU6h4kNvC hj1S7eJ6d5Ks+rHO9wWnf46vsRJpjiem/HBTKrvAU0DpIt/E9bBwlMZxvNgioDMSuWu0 bKxUSY51ZJS038Cwe1BnhtmgOkKF3YXS4lhjBxSlFu3F3h5l/PXvaTYF3YAoSgumMHbp XT3A==
X-Received by 10.140.93.117 with SMTP id c108mr165673349qge.101.1452566912030; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 18:48:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <CACs7g=AuW8UTVS+SRM-bG=-Ne18W5VLt2CfTDjS0i1cH2qwtpw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:101512

Show key headers only | View raw


On Jan 11, 2016, at 9:53 AM, srinivas devaki <mr.eightnoteight@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 11, 2016 12:18 AM, "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> wrote:
>> Indeed. I already do the sweep method as you suggested. ;)
>> 
>> Additionally, you provided me with a reasonable condition when to do the
> sweep in order to achieve O(log n). Thanks much for that. I currently used
> a time-bases approached (sweep each 20 iterations).
>> 
>> PS: Could you add a note on how you got to the condition (
> 2*self.useless_b > len(self.heap_b))?
>> 
> 
> oh that's actually simple,
> that condition checks if more than half of heap is useless items.
> the sweep complexity is O(len(heap)), so to keep the extra amortized
> complexity as O(1), we have to split that work(virtually) with O(len(heap))
> operations, so when our condition becomes true we have done len(heap)
> operations, so doing a sweep at that time means we splitted that
> work(O(len(heap))) with every operation.

Jumping in late, but...

If you want something that 'just works', you can use HeapDict:

http://stutzbachenterprises.com/

I've used it in the past, and it works quite well.  I haven't tested its asymptotic performance though, so you might want to check into that.

Thanks,
Cem Karan

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: How to remove item from heap efficiently? Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 21:48 -0500

csiph-web