Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #17435
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'thread,': 0.04; 'suppose': 0.05; 'disagree': 0.07; 'subject:based': 0.07; 'type,': 0.07; 'typed': 0.07; 'comparisons': 0.09; 'const': 0.09; 'integer,': 0.09; 'it;': 0.09; 'pointer.': 0.09; 'way;': 0.09; 'weak': 0.09; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.13; 'received:mail- iy0-f174.google.com': 0.13; 'thanks!': 0.14; 'typing': 0.15; '+1.': 0.16; 'boolean': 0.16; 'compiler,': 0.16; 'disagree.': 0.16; 'driscoll': 0.16; 'foo(int': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'function?': 0.16; 'int.': 0.16; "languages'": 0.16; 'list!': 0.16; 'maybe,': 0.16; 'mean,': 0.16; 'nonzero': 0.16; 'not;': 0.16; 'pointer,': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:syntax': 0.16; 'thread.': 0.16; 'trimming': 0.16; 'useless.': 0.16; 'value"': 0.16; 'zero,': 0.16; 'syntax': 0.16; 'language': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'int': 0.18; 'string,': 0.18; 'that?': 0.18; 'memory': 0.21; 'dec': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.22; 'works.': 0.23; 'string': 0.24; "i'm": 0.26; 'expect': 0.26; 'do.': 0.28; 'tend': 0.28; "wasn't": 0.28; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'likes': 0.29; 'pm,': 0.29; 'fairly': 0.30; 'lot.': 0.30; 'sun,': 0.30; 'whitespace': 0.30; '(the': 0.30; 'chris': 0.30; 'quite': 0.32; 'does': 0.32; 'actual': 0.32; 'me?': 0.32; 'pretty': 0.32; 'there': 0.33; 'object': 0.33; 'points': 0.34; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'normally': 0.34; 'certain': 0.34; 'curious': 0.34; 'integer': 0.34; 'operations': 0.35; 'running': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'subject:/': 0.35; 'are:': 0.35; 'url:python': 0.36; 'however,': 0.36; 'post': 0.36; 'beginning': 0.36; 'example,': 0.37; '(to': 0.37; 'archives:': 0.37; 'suddenly': 0.37; 'url:pipermail': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; "there's": 0.37; 'think': 0.37; 'could': 0.37; 'some': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; "i'd": 0.39; 'url:org': 0.39; 'strong': 0.39; "it's": 0.40; 'received:209': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'might': 0.40; 'happens': 0.40; 'more': 0.61; 'type': 0.61; '2011': 0.61; 'types': 0.61; 'your': 0.61; 'double': 0.61; 'happen': 0.61; 'provided': 0.62; 'efficient': 0.62; 'leading': 0.62; 'making': 0.67; 'high': 0.67; 'special': 0.68; 'delivered': 0.69; 'become': 0.69; 'care': 0.71; 'stand': 0.72; 'expectations': 0.77; "'1'": 0.84; 'subjective': 0.84; 'this...': 0.84; 'technically': 0.93 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=iuB3mafzsqOkkAQYmFOcmw6wADEeSotdPNmqVfhlIYw=; b=gQqR87dyX8/0HEZacF02PhWMMK1g0RtjbFmuDLLR8kp18H5JtmBaDvLQs0CvkJth6M hBVhta+BxkXl+NvUIEyKXQ9Pj5OT/1vghKA/mg1CuofPObecYXpVYMmiithD64212xRQ lsXCKoi9ZAycWyJodWOcxX5w92vcLyzhhAVNI= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <4EED6F64.5020906@wisc.edu> |
| References | <841f4d29-f50b-4b0b-912b-b497fb6e60ec@t16g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <4eed3b00$0$29979$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CAPTjJmr2+CPjM7am1d8c9rFdTXnK5HFGpAAN=cj6DqPj5YYVuQ@mail.gmail.com> <4EED57E5.2020900@wisc.edu> <CAPTjJmoOTcAB=zFfgSCnux6Qr+LCoNyeQVE+148gk9Je6-xQFg@mail.gmail.com> <4EED6F64.5020906@wisc.edu> |
| Date | Sun, 18 Dec 2011 16:00:46 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3783.1324184448.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 60 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1324184448 news.xs4all.nl 6947 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37613 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:17435 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu> wrote:
> On 12/17/2011 21:42, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Welcome to the list! If you're curious as to what's happened, check
>> the archives:
>> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/
> Thanks! Incidentally, is there a good way to respond to the original
> post in this thread, considering it wasn't delivered to me?
I don't know of a way, but this works. It's all part of the same thread.
> I mean, suppose '1' were an object and implemented
> __lt__. Does it suddenly become not weak typing because of that?
Is it weak typing to overload a function?
//C++ likes this a lot.
int foo(int x,int y) {return x*3+y;}
double foo(double x,double y) {return x*3+y;}
This is definitely making the term "strongly typed language" fairly useless.
> (The other thing is that I think strong vs weak is more subjective than
> many of the other measures. Is '1 < True' or '"1"+1' weaker? I think it
> has a lot to do with how the operations provided by the language play to
> your expectations.)
+1. My expectations are:
1) The Boolean value "True" might be the same as a nonzero integer, or
might not; it would make sense to use inequality comparisons with
zero, MAYBE, but not with 1. So I don't particularly care what the
language does with "1 < True", because it's not something that I would
normally do.
2) "1"+1, in any high level language with an actual string type, I
would expect to produce "11". It makes the most sense this way; having
it return 2 means there's a special case where the string happens to
look like a number - meaning that " 1"+1 is different from "1"+1. That
just feels wrong to me... but I'm fully aware that many other people
will disagree.
Yep, it's pretty subjective.
> On 12/17/2011 22:05, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Not quite; 1 + "one" will be "ne", which might happen to be at memory
>> location 2. The data type is going to be char* (or, in a modern
>> compiler, const char*), not int.
> I'm not quite sure I'd say that it could be 2, exactly, but I definitely
> disagree with this... after running 'int x = 5, *p = &x' would you say
> that "p is 5"? (Assume &x != 5.) 1+"one" *points to* "ne", but it's
> still a pointer.
Point. I stand corrected. I tend to think of a char* as "being" the
string, even though technically it only points to the beginning of it;
it's the nearest thing C has to a string type. (To be honest, it's
still a lot better than many high level languages' string types for
certain common operations - eg trimming leading whitespace is pretty
efficient on a PSZ.) In your example, p would be some integer value
that is the pointer, but *p is 5. However, there's really no syntax in
C to say what the "string value" is.
ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-17 06:38 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-17 17:00 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-12-17 12:14 -0500
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 04:18 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-17 12:11 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-17 23:20 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-18 00:59 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 13:45 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-18 03:33 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-12-17 22:59 -0500
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 15:05 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu> - 2011-12-17 21:03 -0600
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-18 08:46 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu> - 2011-12-17 21:08 -0600
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 14:42 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu> - 2011-12-17 22:43 -0600
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 16:00 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 06:13 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-18 17:03 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 09:40 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax buck <workitharder@gmail.com> - 2011-12-17 20:52 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 16:21 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu> - 2011-12-17 23:33 -0600
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-18 07:31 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 19:43 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-12-18 08:58 -0500
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 01:06 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu> - 2011-12-18 13:56 -0600
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-19 15:23 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-18 08:36 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu> - 2011-12-18 13:47 -0600
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-19 01:26 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 18:16 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 15:57 -0600
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-12-19 19:30 -0500
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 19:41 -0600
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 19:38 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 22:04 -0600
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-20 20:51 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 20:00 -0700
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-19 03:36 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 06:35 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu> - 2011-12-18 14:20 -0600
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 18:23 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 15:35 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 19:31 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-20 15:10 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 02:15 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 19:30 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-24 06:39 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-12-24 16:24 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2011-12-24 17:01 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-25 06:45 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-25 13:12 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-25 07:38 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-26 03:23 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-26 12:58 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-27 08:05 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-26 14:12 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-27 09:37 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-25 17:05 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-26 13:41 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-27 22:57 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-28 03:57 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 17:04 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 16:59 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 02:20 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 19:35 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-20 05:47 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 22:39 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2011-12-20 11:58 +0200
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-24 06:45 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-25 02:01 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-24 09:23 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-25 04:51 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-25 12:50 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-25 06:59 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-24 06:41 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Neal Becker <ndbecker2@gmail.com> - 2011-12-21 10:48 -0500
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-24 06:47 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-25 01:57 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-24 09:21 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-25 13:13 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-25 07:47 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-27 23:10 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2011-12-27 17:11 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-28 04:05 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-28 15:06 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-28 06:25 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-28 18:08 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-28 04:08 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> - 2011-12-29 09:29 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-29 03:55 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-29 13:23 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-29 06:20 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> - 2011-12-30 10:24 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-30 10:30 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-12-21 08:33 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu> - 2011-12-17 23:54 -0600
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 06:23 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2011-12-18 16:57 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Neal Becker <ndbecker2@gmail.com> - 2011-12-22 06:49 -0500
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-22 13:12 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-23 00:30 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Hans Mulder <hansmu@xs4all.nl> - 2011-12-22 15:13 +0100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-23 01:30 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Mel Wilson <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-12-22 10:06 -0500
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-24 06:54 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-25 12:45 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-25 06:55 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-25 16:15 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-26 12:39 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-27 08:01 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-26 13:51 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-27 09:27 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-26 15:44 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-27 11:52 +1100
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-27 02:01 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-01-02 18:38 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2012-01-02 21:39 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-01-02 23:01 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2012-01-03 03:21 -0800
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-27 23:07 +0000
Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-28 04:04 -0800
csiph-web