Re: Is this PEP-able? fwhile

Date	2013-06-24 23:45 +0100
From	MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
Subject	Re: Is this PEP-able? fwhile
References	<8D03F2B8CF0E7BE-1864-1796B@webmail-m103.sysops.aol.com> <CAPTjJmrwNyF2-J8F3ii8W4WpkrNC67+i88ODLyiqHGa_7bz0Xg@mail.gmail.com> <20130624173050.5e16debf@bigbox.christie.dr> <CAPTjJmoHtrRSmag1woY5d-5=nauR40oijMbxP7Oda+Y=dH17iA@mail.gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.3780.1372113953.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 24/06/2013 23:35, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Tim Chase
> <python.list@tim.thechases.com> wrote:
>> On 2013-06-25 07:38, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> Python has no issues with breaking out of loops, and even has
>>> syntax specifically to complement it (the 'else:' clause). Use
>>> break/continue when appropriate.
>>
>> from minor_gripes import breaking_out_of_nested_loops_to_top_level
>
> True. There are times I do wish for a 'goto'. But if goto were
> implemented, I would also use it for jumping _into_ loops, and I'm not
> sure that's going to make the feature popular :)
>
I think a better way would be to label the outer loop somehow and then
break out of it by name.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Is this PEP-able? fwhile MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-06-24 23:45 +0100

csiph-web