Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #33477
| References | <f063ebaf-89ee-4558-a762-0241efa39dcc@googlegroups.com> <pan.2012.11.17.00.33.13.539000@nowhere.com> <32ab6e2e-e1b1-41ea-8ef4-6e4f763065bf@googlegroups.com> <CALwzidmESMACFiqjs2YPQMNW2qyN8vcyryuocehfF2P5qK6Mdg@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2012-11-17 11:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: latin1 and cp1252 inconsistent? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3776.1353176064.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 9:56 AM, <buck@yelp.com> wrote: >> "should" is a wish. The reality is that documents (and especially URLs) exist that can be decoded with latin1, but will backtrace with cp1252. I see this as a sign that a small refactorization of cp1252 is in order. The proposal is to change those "UNDEFINED" entries to "<control>" entries, as is done here: >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/encoding/raw-file/tip/index-windows-1252.txt >> >> and here: >> >> ftp://ftp.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/VENDORS/MICSFT/WindowsBestFit/bestfit1252.txt > > The README for the "BestFit" document states: > > """ > These tables include "best fit" behavior which is not present in the > other files. Examples of best fit > are converting fullwidth letters to their counterparts when converting > to single byte code pages, and > mapping the Infinity character to the number 8. > """ > > This does not sound like appropriate behavior for a generalized > conversion scheme. It is also noted that the "BestFit" document is > not authoritative at: > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/charset-reg/windows-1252 I meant to also comment on the first link, but forgot. As that document is published by the W3C, I understand it to be specific to the Web, which Python is not. Hence I think the more general Unicode specification is more appropriate for Python.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
latin1 and cp1252 inconsistent? buck@yelp.com - 2012-11-16 13:44 -0800
Re: latin1 and cp1252 inconsistent? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-11-16 15:33 -0700
Re: latin1 and cp1252 inconsistent? buck@yelp.com - 2012-11-16 15:27 -0800
Re: latin1 and cp1252 inconsistent? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-11-16 19:05 -0500
Re: latin1 and cp1252 inconsistent? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-11-16 17:20 -0700
Re: latin1 and cp1252 inconsistent? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-11-18 01:48 -0500
Re: latin1 and cp1252 inconsistent? buck@yelp.com - 2012-11-16 15:27 -0800
Re: latin1 and cp1252 inconsistent? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-11-17 00:33 +0000
Re: latin1 and cp1252 inconsistent? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-11-16 18:08 -0700
Re: latin1 and cp1252 inconsistent? buck@yelp.com - 2012-11-17 08:56 -0800
Re: latin1 and cp1252 inconsistent? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-11-17 11:08 -0700
Re: latin1 and cp1252 inconsistent? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-11-17 11:13 -0700
Re: latin1 and cp1252 inconsistent? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-11-17 19:15 +0000
csiph-web