Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #52229
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.046 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.91; '*S*': 0.01; 'pop': 0.05; 'subject:PEP': 0.07; 'deque': 0.16; 'mutability': 0.16; 'parameter.': 0.16; 'popping': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'index': 0.16; 'sender:addr:gmail.com': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'normally': 0.19; 'somewhere': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'argue': 0.31; 'index,': 0.31; 'to:name :python-list': 0.33; 'subject:from': 0.34; 'subject:lists': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'being': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'middle': 0.60; 'august': 0.61; 'today,': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'complexity': 0.84; 'hassle': 0.84; '2013': 0.98 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=qzCIFNA9bD25yOCtzC87fl77NLR0oByYEkfZmRLRXHY=; b=xq4zHf0l7JUxS0XZyAEpp17knyZM7wBtVcrEYsfVyy3JUXw62lYcniuTx9QZlr11Yi CgO9ayEA4tUbWM2+/2kYlTRcyErYyufifBeS/uf7wrScXRbJanCBymkBPRYo7e9wBK9G PoEVNgha/DwpEuIAqPa5uNn8kukMXmYiHVEQBj3YclpJlo6Q93iD2c63q4+1fyKUVKUc iwr4Z7bWBk/W6534UnC9ZGIIKoIcfZeGYh27+FwtDqqEaQj8Hyp9MFl35q1C4fRkZGxX 95kBvF2PsAb6DzfgKhu9CaAUU7Ks/lyvF2tTt5hRGac7rsdth52UObraFaarBx5hEIlp Ctug== |
| X-Received | by 10.112.33.205 with SMTP id t13mr3272695lbi.22.1375997587399; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 14:33:07 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Sender | joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com |
| In-Reply-To | <ku0tia$nkk$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| References | <dac4873d-4111-4880-9ce5-80f4ecf11685@googlegroups.com> <mailman.345.1375956533.1251.python-list@python.org> <531d89a8-61e1-4117-b4cc-f02b3be30bb9@googlegroups.com> <mailman.347.1375960376.1251.python-list@python.org> <9bd6192b-2c71-4662-808a-fd7e74dedeb8@googlegroups.com> <ku0tia$nkk$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| From | Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> |
| Date | Thu, 8 Aug 2013 22:32:27 +0100 |
| X-Google-Sender-Auth | SE21vJQQHgLG5Pt6oFXNNy4dm6g |
| Subject | Re: Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists |
| To | python-list <python-list@python.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.374.1375997589.1251.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 14 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1375997589 news.xs4all.nl 15963 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:47495 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:52229 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 8 August 2013 21:03, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote: > If .pop were being added today, I would argue against including the index > parameter. GASP! That's no fair! 1) When using pop you normally want to keep the mutability available, so iter(mylist) is a no-go. 2) When using the index, it's often somewhere in the middle that you're popping from 3) There's always deque for deques That said you can always use blist which has O(log n) time complexity for these pops. It's a hassle it's not stdlib :/.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists Neatu Ovidiu Gabriel <neatuovi@gmail.com> - 2013-08-08 02:45 -0700
Re: Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-08-08 12:07 +0200
Re: Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists Neatu Ovidiu <neatuovi@gmail.com> - 2013-08-08 03:38 -0700
Re: Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists Nicholas Cole <nicholas.cole@gmail.com> - 2013-08-08 12:12 +0100
Re: Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists Neatu Ovidiu <neatuovi@gmail.com> - 2013-08-08 04:40 -0700
Re: Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2013-08-08 09:20 -0500
Re: Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists Neatu Ovidiu <neatuovi@gmail.com> - 2013-08-08 04:44 -0700
Re: Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists Neatu Ovidiu <neatuovi@gmail.com> - 2013-08-08 04:50 -0700
Re: Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists Nicholas Cole <nicholas.cole@gmail.com> - 2013-08-08 14:08 +0100
Re: Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists Neatu Ovidiu <neatuovi@gmail.com> - 2013-08-08 06:32 -0700
Re: Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists Nicholas Cole <nicholas.cole@gmail.com> - 2013-08-08 15:03 +0100
Re: Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-08-08 16:03 -0400
Re: Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-08-08 22:32 +0100
Re: Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-08-08 16:50 -0500
Re: Suggestion: PEP for popping slices from lists Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-08-08 18:10 -0400
csiph-web