Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #41841
| References | <CAPTjJmouUzXNr4Oq==LYB1UZ2UQb13Y6vTHGGzuzNXorNthjYg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.3705.1364253727.2939.python-list@python.org> <5150e900$0$29998$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-26 11:28 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Performance of int/long in Python 3 |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3708.1364257709.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote: > Also, speaking as somebody who remembers a time when ints where not > automatically promoted to longs (introduced in, Python 2.2, I think?) let > me say that having a single unified int type is *fantastic*, and managing > ints/longs by hand is a right royal PITA. Oh, I absolutely agree! I'm just looking at performance here, but definitely the int/long unification is a Good Thing. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Performance of int/long in Python 3 Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-03-25 16:16 -0700
Re: Performance of int/long in Python 3 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-03-26 00:17 +0000
Re: Performance of int/long in Python 3 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-03-26 11:28 +1100
Re: Performance of int/long in Python 3 Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-03-26 00:49 +0000
Re: Performance of int/long in Python 3 Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-03-25 20:55 -0400
Re: Performance of int/long in Python 3 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-03-26 05:01 +0000
Re: Performance of int/long in Python 3 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-03-26 17:12 +1100
Re: Performance of int/long in Python 3 Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-03-26 09:18 -0400
csiph-web