Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #61255

Re: One liners

From Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject Re: One liners
Date 2013-12-07 16:02 -0500
References (4 earlier) <52a287cb$0$30003$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <roy-10E325.22270006122013@news.panix.com> <52a30632$0$30003$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <qotfvq4suj6.fsf@ruuvi.it.helsinki.fi> <l7vhem$tf1$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3707.1386450167.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/7/2013 11:13 AM, Rotwang wrote:
> On 07/12/2013 12:41, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>    if tracks is None:
>>       tracks = []
>
> Sorry to go off on a tangent, but in my code I often have stuff like
> this at the start of functions:
>
>      tracks = something if tracks is None else tracks
>
> or, in the case where I don't intend for the function to be passed
> non-default Falsey values:
>
>      tracks = tracks or something
>
> Is there any reason why the two-line version that avoids the ternary
> operator should be preferred to the above?

The 'extra' line is not necessary, as one can write

if tracks is None: tracks = [] # or something

I prefer this because it exactly expresses what one want done. The other 
branch

else: tracks = tracks

is superfluous and to me unaesthetic.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: One liners Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-12-06 17:20 -0700
  Re: One liners Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-07 02:28 +0000
    Re: One liners Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-07 13:40 +1100
    Re: One liners Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-06 22:27 -0500
      Re: One liners Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-07 15:06 +1100
      Re: One liners Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-07 11:27 +0000
        Re: One liners Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-12-07 14:41 +0200
          Re: One liners Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-12-07 16:13 +0000
            Re: One liners Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-07 16:25 +0000
              Re: One liners Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-12-08 02:23 +0000
            Re: One liners Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-12-07 09:26 -0700
            Re: One liners Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-12-07 19:49 +0200
            Re: One liners Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-12-07 16:02 -0500
      Re: One liners Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-12-07 09:56 -0700
        Re: One liners rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-07 09:10 -0800
      Re: One liners Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-12-07 10:02 -0700

csiph-web