Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #12110
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.01; 'languages,': 0.03; 'lines.': 0.05; 'memory.': 0.05; 'function,': 0.07; 'indeed,': 0.07; 'received:verizon.net': 0.07; 'subject:when': 0.07; 'terry': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'exceptions': 0.09; 'invocation': 0.09; 'omit': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'subject:python': 0.11; 'am,': 0.12; 'block,': 0.16; 'bytecode': 0.16; 'constructs': 0.16; 'defs': 0.16; 'function?': 0.16; 'iteration.': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:function': 0.16; 'subject:writing': 0.16; 'versus': 0.16; 'syntax': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'avoiding': 0.18; 'jan': 0.19; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'faster,': 0.23; 'function': 0.27; '(and': 0.29; 'print': 0.29; 'lines': 0.30; 'recursion': 0.30; 'functional': 0.31; 'translate': 0.31; 'least': 0.31; 'does': 0.32; 'there': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'things': 0.34; 'retain': 0.34; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.35; 'unless': 0.36; 'example,': 0.37; 'languages': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'should': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'header :Mime-Version:1': 0.39; 'define': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'more': 0.60; '100': 0.73; 'alternative.': 0.84; 'habit': 0.84; 'purpose,': 0.84; 'so:': 0.84; 'subject:any': 0.84; 'subject:there': 0.91; 'complexity': 0.93; 'many,': 0.93 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
| Subject | Re: is there any principle when writing python function |
| Date | Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:19:15 -0400 |
| References | <CAN1FwxcMc0rFqw=DgOm_cCgvbymMOXjYQzefPxnhEkjyk9vUuQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | pool-74-109-121-73.phlapa.fios.verizon.net |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <CAN1FwxcMc0rFqw=DgOm_cCgvbymMOXjYQzefPxnhEkjyk9vUuQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.364.1314123599.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 57 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1314123599 news.xs4all.nl 23889 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45834 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:12110 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 8/23/2011 7:59 AM, smith jack wrote:
> i have heard that function invocation in python is expensive,
That comes into play when chosing between
list2 = map(lambda x: 2*x, list1) # versus
list2 = [2*x for x in list1]
It also comes into play when choosing between looping with recursion
(function calls) versus looping with iteration (while/for). In Python,
the iteration is faster, while some functional languages omit looping
syntax constructs and perhaps auto-translate some recursion to iteration.
> but makelots of functions are a good design habit in many other languages,
Same for Python, with the exceptions noted above of avoiding trivial
one-use functions when there is an alternative.
> is there any principle when writing python function?
Same as usual. Functions define new words and create new abstractions
than encapsulate a unit of computation.
> for example, how many lines should form a function?
1 to many, as long as the 1 is more complex than 2*x, unless the trivial
function is required for a callback. I doubt the stdlib has many defs
longer than 100 lines.
Try the following: complex enough that the function call overhead does
not matter; simple enough to be understood as a unit.
I just came up with the following hypothesis: the complexity of a
function is related to the number of *different* functions used to
define it:
x = a*b + c/d - e**f
is more complex (harder to understand) than
x = a + b + c + d + e + f
For this purpose, different statememts count as functions (and indeed,
they translate to bytecode functions. So:
for i in iterable:
if f(i):
print i
is more complex than
a = 1
b = 2
c = 3
d = 4
People can retain at most about 10 different things in short term
memory. So perhaps 10 different 'functions' within a function, or at
least a commented block, is enough.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: is there any principle when writing python function Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-08-23 14:19 -0400
csiph-web