Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #17148

Re: Signature-preserving decorators

References <jc7kd4$sak$1@speranza.aioe.org>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date 2011-12-13 09:26 -0700
Subject Re: Signature-preserving decorators
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3605.1323793653.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Henrik Faber <hfaber@invalid.net> wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> when decorating a method in Python3, by use of the
> functools.update_wrapper function, it can be achieved that the docstring
> and name of the original function is preseverved.
>
> However, the prototype is lost: When looking into the Python help, I
> have lots of entries that look like:
>
> getfoo(*args, **kwargs) -> int
>
> setbar(*args, **kwargs)
>
> As you can imagine, this is really not very self-explanatory. I've seen
> a solution which constructs a wrapper's wrapper function using
> inspection and eval -- this looks really dirty to me, however. Then
> there's the "decorator" external module -- but I'd like to do it with
> on-board tools.
>
> Is this possible in Python3 with too much of a hassle?

The decorator module also uses inspection and eval to do it, by the
way.  Currently there is no pretty way to do it that I know of, but
see PEP 362:

http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0362/

That PEP has unfortunately been in the "Open" state for quite a long
time now, but it seems to me that a lot of people are starting to get
interested in this issue, so maybe it will start to pick up some steam
before too long.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Signature-preserving decorators Henrik Faber <hfaber@invalid.net> - 2011-12-13 14:36 +0100
  Re: Signature-preserving decorators Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-12-13 09:26 -0700

csiph-web