Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #41673
| References | <1363896869.1738.30.camel@linux-86wr.site> <CAF3XjbyqLpYdCnJcf5hCCLpbEnm32MDO9eic0N5Lu1hpnCthwQ@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Windows Deployment Of Python Modules |
| From | Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org> |
| Date | 2013-03-21 18:23 -0400 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3603.1363904627.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
David Robinow <drobinow@gmail.com> wrote: >On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Adam Tauno Williams ><awilliam@whitemice.org> wrote: >> >> Python itself is easy to deploy on Windows; just toss the MSI in >your >> local update server and away it goes. >> >> That's slick; LSUS is awesome. >> <http://www.localupdatepublisher.com/> >> >> But that gives you Python with no pip, easy_install, etc... And >*that* >> is not packaged appropriately. Is there some trick to getting >modules >> installed on Windows workstations en masse [in an automated fashion]? >> It seems like I must be missing something. >> For example, I want Python installed, and the iniparse module. >python setup.py install >Am I missing something? Yes! That does not get the package to the workstation. It also is not conducive to automation (or success auditing). -- Adam Tauno Williams
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Windows Deployment Of Python Modules Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org> - 2013-03-21 18:23 -0400
csiph-web