Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #61034
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: status of regex modules |
| Date | 2013-12-04 16:21 +0000 |
| References | <l4c4hr$1lr$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3574.1386174094.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 24/10/2013 22:47, Mark Lawrence wrote: > The new module is now five years old. PEP 429 Python 3.4 release > schedule has it listed under "Other proposed large-scale changes" but I > don't believe this is actually happening. Lots of issues on the bug > tracker have been closed as fixed in the new module, see issue 2636 for > more data. Some work is still being carried out on the old re module. > > So where do we stand? Is the new module getting into Python 3.x, Python > 4.y or what? If no do all the old issues have to be reopened and > applied to the re module? Who has to make the final decision on all of > this? > > Note that I've no direct interest as I rarely if ever use the little > perishers, I just find this situation bizarre. > Anybody? And FTR I'll break Armed Forces Rule No. 1 and volunteer my own pitifully poor servies if I can help take this forward, as I think it's daft having issues marked as fixed on the bug tracker but the fix not being available in the standard library, only on pypi. -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: status of regex modules Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-04 16:21 +0000
csiph-web