Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #17085

Re: Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/12/2011 12:12 PM, Eelco wrote:

> Im not sure if this is a genuine understanding, or trollish
> obtuseness.

If you are referring to what I write, it is based on genuine 
understanding of Python.

> Yes, the target can be anywhere in the sequence. And yes, the
> resulting list can contain objects of any type, so its very flexible
> in that regard too.
>
> But to relate it to the topic of this thread: no, the syntax does not
> allow one to select the type of the resulting sequence. It always
> constructs a list.

One use case of *target is to ignore the stuff collected in the target 
because one only wants a few end values from the iterable. Another is to 
pull stuff out because one wants to iterate through the rest. For both 
uses, a list is as good as anything.

> Yes, we can cast the list to be whatever we want on the next line,

Convert. For the very few cases one wants to do this, it is quite adequate.

 > but the question is whether this language design can be improved upon.

Not easily.

> The choice of a list feels arbitrary,

On the contrary, a list is precisely what is needed to collect an 
indefinite number of leftovers.

 > adding another line to cast it to
> something else would be even more verbose, and whats more, there would
> be serious performance implications if one should seek to apply this
> pattern to a deque/linkedlist; it would make taking off the head/tail
> of the list from a constant to a linear operation.

For a linked list, no *target and no copying is needed:

head, tail = llist

>>>> head, deque(tail) = somedeque
>
> Is better in every way I can think of (readability, consistence,
> performance) than:

>>>> head, *tail = somedeque
>>>> tail = deque(tail)

But your suggestion is much worse in each way than

head = somedeque.popleft()

To repeat, there is no reason to copy even once. If one does not want to 
mutate the deque, then one mutates an iterator view of the deque.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-12-12 10:52 -0500
  Re: Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 09:12 -0800
    Re: Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-12-12 16:58 -0500
      Re: Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 15:40 -0800
        Re: Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 18:41 -0700
          Re: Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-13 00:44 -0800
            Re: Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-13 01:26 -0800
            Re: Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-12-13 11:15 -0700
              Re: Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-13 12:32 -0800
      Re: Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-13 01:34 +0000
    Re: Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 16:27 -0800
      Re: Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-13 00:30 -0800
        Re: Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2011-12-14 06:11 +1100
          Re: Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco@gmail.com> - 2011-12-13 12:14 -0800

csiph-web