Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #60967
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.023 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'extracted': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'mostly': 0.14; 'heapq': 0.16; 'loop.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'simpson': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'elements': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'do.': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; "haven't": 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'appear': 0.29; 'dec': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; "i'd": 0.34; "can't": 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'thanks': 0.36; 'too': 0.37; 'same.': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'ian': 0.60; 'mentioned': 0.61; 'subject:more': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'believe': 0.68; 'nobody': 0.68; 'subject:there': 0.68; 'fact,': 0.69; 'imagine': 0.93; '2013': 0.98 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> |
| Subject | Re: extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution |
| Date | Tue, 03 Dec 2013 17:32:39 -0500 |
| References | <bg60hjF83eoU1@mid.dfncis.de> <20131203211303.GA83257@cskk.homeip.net> <CALwzidmmqLzFtNyRVmcY6j7gvRxPQh-vNune4XXXzrqMjChapA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | 18.189.126.187 |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 |
| In-Reply-To | <CALwzidmmqLzFtNyRVmcY6j7gvRxPQh-vNune4XXXzrqMjChapA@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3534.1386109973.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 21 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1386109973 news.xs4all.nl 2863 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46820 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:60967 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 12/3/13 4:43 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> wrote: >> On 03Dec2013 12:18, Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: >>> I'd like to extracted elements from a heapq in a for loop. >>> I feel my solution below is much too complicated. >>> How to do it more elegantly? >> >> I can't believe nobody has mentioned PriorityQueue. > > As far as I'm aware, the only advantage of PriorityQueue over heapq is > that the former is thread-safe, which does not appear to be relevant > here. I haven't tested it for speed, but I imagine it would be a fair > bit slower, mostly thanks to the locking it needs to do. > In fact, if you look at the implementation of PriorityQueue, it uses a heapq internally, so yes, other than the locking, the speed will be the same. --Ned.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-12-03 12:18 +0000
Re: extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-12-03 13:38 +0100
Re: extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-12-04 09:36 +0000
Re: extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-12-04 10:50 +0100
Re: extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-03 04:40 -0800
Re: extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-12-04 09:37 +0000
Re: extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-03 13:06 +0000
Re: extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-12-04 09:39 +0000
Re: extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-12-03 15:56 +0200
Re: extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-12-04 09:41 +0000
Re: extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-12-04 08:13 +1100
Re: extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-12-04 09:44 +0000
Re: extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-12-05 13:29 +1100
Re: extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-12-03 14:43 -0700
Re: extracting a heapq in a for loop - there must be more elegant solution Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-12-03 17:32 -0500
csiph-web