Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #17001
| From | Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: unittest. customizing tstloaders / discover() |
| Date | 2011-12-12 02:32 +0100 |
| References | <mailman.3518.1323638859.27778.python-list@python.org> <87y5uiu1t4.fsf@jubold.box> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3525.1323653551.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 12/12/2011 12:27 AM, Thomas Bach wrote: > Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> writes: > >> I'd like to use regular expresions as include / exclude rules >> and I would like to have another filter function, which would check for >> the existence of certain metavariabels in test suite files > > Did you have a look at nose? I'm using it and it supports > include/exclude rules via RE and lets you select directories to run > tests from. > > I'm not sure about the meta-variable thing, but it supports plug ins > that could do the trick… > I looked at nose very briefly, but too short to form a real opinion and to understand whether nose would have any negative impact on existing unit tests. Do I loose anything if using nose. or example can all unit tests / doc tests still be run from nose?
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
unittest. customizing tstloaders / discover() Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> - 2011-12-11 22:27 +0100
Re: unittest. customizing tstloaders / discover() Thomas Bach <bachth@uni-mainz.de> - 2011-12-12 00:27 +0100
Re: unittest. customizing tstloaders / discover() Gelonida N <gelonida@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 02:32 +0100
Re: unittest. customizing tstloaders / discover() Thomas Bach <bachth@uni-mainz.de> - 2011-12-12 11:44 +0100
Re: unittest. customizing tstloaders / discover() Nathan Rice <nathan.alexander.rice@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 11:50 -0500
csiph-web