Re: Language improvement: Get more from the `for .. else` clause

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From	Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: Language improvement: Get more from the `for .. else` clause
Date	Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:06:20 +0000
Lines	8
Message-ID	<mailman.35.1467039992.2358.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References	<CAGtOLTfKid2EtrfKyKq9kA6205D7E5j7fAMcVfALuh6RFw4xyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGgTfkOgOc4jrfA5-5ufRtfQECO0pDcPW7MxXRW4nx0uaq8Hng@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace	news.uni-berlin.de SvW13gGkgHVeBwtLhwRWPQ3bo2CyAL1aI1/WYwlXX5Uw==
Return-Path	<michael.selik@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.104
X-Spam-Level	*
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.80; 'S': 0.00; 'received:mail- qk0-x22c.google.com': 0.09; '2016': 0.16; 'example?': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:Language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'email addr:gmail.com>': 0.18; 'to:2**1': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'feature': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; "i'm": 0.30; 'skip:[ 10': 0.31; 'statement': 0.32; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'trouble': 0.35; 'necessary.': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'subject:from': 0.39; 'subject:the': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'subject:more': 0.61; 'show': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'capture': 0.66; 'subject:Get': 0.66; 'subject:else': 0.84; 'victor': 0.84; 'realistic': 0.93
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gIm9bNwPGQpv7HE4O4TJMvfvNk7yHhM4Q5/wfK2OtJg=; b=SHMy1ZClPbCiE8TouDo0pMfWU5Xs16K3/GvQhMEysYug5IRb3kLHU5V3ErbgdU6P0a 7/F+oGS72IQdiBxPF9uMri9XIyAgRFJq/yTnjlDgx4IXzVDOM214X/d39cMTc4It+KR3 l+idO6HZY+f+gG+JYSmzlMaq1HL9oo2Hi4hJ018tm0v3km+LZiuf+Kgzvuv6g+aaPCv6 ueXxrAJl+868TYpDgGpugOLI50E2cXdHBQkDMhtR249nfG0Yw5YeKMmMDEn+Aip+dV8/ kgbJabpW4ui/EjZmEgWbXngRxwfn1XaA/seAeHXxNgoiTtNC1SHumDh7l79SJZYbSUfj +ZvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=gIm9bNwPGQpv7HE4O4TJMvfvNk7yHhM4Q5/wfK2OtJg=; b=AJbGYStr6e2m/Bo7/Nv7svWVz26YS1zMbdyAL3MTjvB/ZkU7xE4BwD0/CiHYgbDc/K ipnJ4DlK6DbAgsBDE1dJKY+I6NdNIj6LhOvwBn6zcd4XMflk7ycNvwfwGxLdFE+8Zd7u VVnQhAPVR1Kd/8epmsvvUG8hheKTZerb+tNmEzzvxBxFtNQE7xUOYKWzM7k7TV0oUZtJ pxSbnJCWYcatPgz784xZQzuileOa3zXRgZelbZNtOhEBd3Y5jYCE4YisUcUA+kxoAGft ve/qbTB3c8IMsUF1Su+pxTzn6iiZfYLcPc/aB4y6YdNL7ATtrkdvbn9aYxKmFysihAyT +aNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State	ALyK8tIlphozhl/qVkKLrDfQHEHuC0XFexmIeUCWIfnzrAQZ5XxTZlVBW40Zrok8y+U50FRxWMHStW7OA7/EYQ==
X-Received	by 10.55.145.67 with SMTP id t64mr24305324qkd.96.1467039989966; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To	<CAGtOLTfKid2EtrfKyKq9kA6205D7E5j7fAMcVfALuh6RFw4xyA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Content-Filtered-By	Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.22
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID	<CAGgTfkOgOc4jrfA5-5ufRtfQECO0pDcPW7MxXRW4nx0uaq8Hng@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References	<CAGtOLTfKid2EtrfKyKq9kA6205D7E5j7fAMcVfALuh6RFw4xyA@mail.gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:110594

Show key headers only | View raw

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:53 AM Victor Savu <victor.nicolae.savu@gmail.com>
wrote:

> capture the [StopIteration] value in the `else` statement of the `for` loop
>

I'm having trouble thinking of a case when this new feature is necessary.
Can you show a more realistic example?

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Language improvement: Get more from the `for .. else` clause Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 15:06 +0000
  Re: Language improvement: Get more from the `for .. else` clause Quivis <quivis@domain.invalid> - 2016-06-29 00:05 +0000

csiph-web