Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #33027
| References | <mailman.3455.1352396166.27098.python-list@python.org> <509c412d$0$29980$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.3470.1352422891.27098.python-list@python.org> <509d06e7$0$29980$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <DUB117-W135838CDCA85E153BDDC1F991680@phx.gbl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-11-10 01:15 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: duck typing assert |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3494.1352470546.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com> wrote: > > 1. In looks-like we check features of Foo (that may be superset) of what IFoo offers. > > assert looks(Foo).like(IFoo) > > 2. We can check if Foo is limited to IFoo only: > > assert looks(IFoo).like(Foo) > > So it valid to have both asserts. You'll almost never need #2, but since there's no difference between a "class" and an "interface", it's perfectly legal to switch them around. But I would generally expect that unrecognized methods are never a problem (assuming they don't collide with anything) - that, as in Steven's example, it's fine to have an actor who can sing when you don't need her to. When you post job openings, you don't normally ask for someone with "5+ years Python experience and unable to program in REXX" [1]. You're checking for a minimum set of requirements. [1] Though I suppose you might ask for someone who's unable to program in Pascal. Might save you some hassle. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
duck typing assert Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com> - 2012-11-08 20:34 +0300
Re: duck typing assert Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-08 23:33 +0000
Re: duck typing assert Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-11-08 18:00 -0700
Re: duck typing assert Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-11-09 13:36 +0000
RE: duck typing assert Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com> - 2012-11-09 17:01 +0300
Re: duck typing assert Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-11-10 01:15 +1100
RE: duck typing assert Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com> - 2012-11-09 17:37 +0300
Re: duck typing assert Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-11-09 17:14 +1100
RE: duck typing assert Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com> - 2012-11-09 13:26 +0300
RE: duck typing assert "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-11-09 17:37 +0000
RE: duck typing assert Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com> - 2012-11-09 20:55 +0300
csiph-web