Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #16929
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-12-09 10:28 -0800 |
| References | <29996186.628.1323328726122.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfb7> <jbpu9j$1af$1@r03.glglgl.gl> <jbq6li$p9o$1@dough.gmane.org> <mailman.3408.1323344595.27778.python-list@python.org> |
| Subject | Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! |
| From | 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3483.1323455868.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Thursday, December 8, 2011 7:43:12 PM UTC+8, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:22 PM, K.-Michael Aye <kmicha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am still perplexed about decorators though, am happily using Python for
> > many years without them, but maybe i am missing something?
> > For example in the above case, if I want the names attached to each other
> > with a comma, why wouldn't I just create a function doing exactly this? Why
> > would I first write a single name generator and then decorate it so that I
> > never can get single names anymore (this is the case, isn't it? Once
> > decorated, I can not get the original behaviour of the function anymore.
>
> The example given is a toy. It's hardly useful. However, there are a
> number of handy uses for decorators; mostly, they consist of giving a
> single simple keyword to a complicated set of logic. One example is
> the @classmethod and @staticmethod decorators - the code to implement
> them could be uglier than nested inline assembly, but you don't have
> to care, because you just type "@staticmethod" in front of your def
> statement and it does its magic.
>
> Here's a handy trick that I'm sure someone has done in a more sophisticated way:
>
> def trace(func):
> if debugmode:
> return lambda *a,**ka:
> (print(">"+func.__name__),func(*a,**ka),print("<"+func.__name__))[1]
> return func
>
> Then you put @trace in front of all your functions, and if debugmode
> is False, nothing will be done - but set it to true, and you get
> console output at the entry and exit of each function.
>
> >>> @trace
> def test(x):
> print("Test! "+x)
> return 5
>
> >>> test("asdf")
> >test
> Test! asdf
> <test
> 5
>
> Again, it's helpful because it condenses all the logic (including the
> 'debugmode' flag) down to a single high level directive: "Trace this
> function".
>
> ChrisA
I did use decorators to turn functions into iterables to be traced.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
I love the decorator in Python!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-07 23:18 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-12-08 00:04 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-12-08 09:59 +0100
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-08 20:37 +1100
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! K.-Michael Aye <kmichael.aye@gmail.com> - 2011-12-08 12:22 +0100
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! Francesco Bochicchio <bieffe62@gmail.com> - 2011-12-09 04:00 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-08 22:43 +1100
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-12-09 10:57 +0100
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-09 10:28 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-09 16:21 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-09 16:21 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-10 06:04 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-10 06:09 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-12-11 19:35 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-10 06:09 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-10 06:04 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-09 10:28 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! K.-Michael Aye <kmichael.aye@gmail.com> - 2011-12-08 17:24 +0100
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-09 03:38 +1100
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-12-08 21:02 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2011-12-09 10:08 +0000
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-12-11 19:36 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-11 20:51 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-12-11 21:47 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-12 04:16 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-12-11 23:47 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 16:27 +0000
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 16:46 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-12-08 10:54 -0600
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-12-08 10:55 -0600
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-12-08 15:34 -0800
Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-12-08 15:56 -0800
csiph-web