Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #41416
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <laxmikant.general@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.003 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.03; 'args': 0.04; 'raises': 0.07; 'val': 0.07; 'conf': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python- list': 0.10; '3.3,': 0.16; 'subject:which': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'variables': 0.17; 'file.': 0.20; 'import': 0.21; 'skip:_ 20': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'example': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'least': 0.25; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'am,': 0.27; 'question': 0.27; '2.6': 0.27; 'mind.': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'chris': 0.28; 'smart': 0.29; 'url:mailman': 0.29; 'url:python': 0.32; 'print': 0.32; 'url:listinfo': 0.32; 'another': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'skip:m 40': 0.36; 'thank': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'skip:o 20': 0.38; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'you.': 0.61; '2013': 0.84; 'subject:better': 0.84 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LBHdGLgkq3NBg4FfsC8rhduRKUs1lboZeDxX092Y1K4=; b=SPV6pXIL5FP2zJdukAi/2qw0vqSMKZS3wS2CV3metfUjIKbSJXwW51wD1TsxlWhgEX 3aiS0MR0wAaLCjW6qF7OCwHysnRTgbiZYOlMslqByUEGyU8E+gcYKSD4rNOORGNOQ6Mu ko7GVFvn/P0aMNDZojuXgc3cjYMXoricSmOhdC3wg39AYQ02nBnTjDuHQWFRy77Gd8VJ sf/TlirwhZdeEyiFpD6H2STkcZ0jSWaHy62GlIIVjAMkBSrevuRWmL4U1sfmkyEC97si fH/OkFEliueU2EpIm/+Wvi8rAE1h5zvEmGc7R8Bl2QQtKdYQGXqilkZcdd6V6ofVdyLk uwdQ== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Received | by 10.194.77.129 with SMTP id s1mr25294288wjw.17.1363615117474; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 06:58:37 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To | <CAPTjJmpDpqKfwx056VmR8umpX5aUPZsxNTVzGmXUkW_P_-ttYQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <CAFtnWG-8dndo6KYrmKvgsbiB5YkfBOgbPLrzHXauuOygvGbHtw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmpDpqKfwx056VmR8umpX5aUPZsxNTVzGmXUkW_P_-ttYQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Date | Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:28:37 +0530 |
| Subject | Re: "eval vs operator.methodcaller" - which is better? |
| From | Laxmikant Chitare <laxmikant.general@gmail.com> |
| To | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3445.1363615119.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 27 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1363615119 news.xs4all.nl 6941 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40291 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:41416 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Aha, that was smart Chris. Thank you.
But this raises another question in my mind. What is the use case for
operator.methodcaller ?
On 3/18/13, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Laxmikant Chitare
> <laxmikant.general@gmail.com> wrote:
>> moduleName = 'mymodule' #These two variables are read from conf file.
>> methodName = 'mymethod'
>>
>> import operator
>> myModule = __import__('mymodule')
>> myMethod = operator.methodcaller('mymethod')
>> val = myMethod(myModule)
>> print val
>
> Is there any reason not to do the obvious?
>
> val = myModule.__getattribute__(methodName)(... args ...)
>
> Works in 2.6 and 3.3, at least on the trivial example I tried.
>
> ChrisA
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: "eval vs operator.methodcaller" - which is better? Laxmikant Chitare <laxmikant.general@gmail.com> - 2013-03-18 19:28 +0530 Re: "eval vs operator.methodcaller" - which is better? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-03-18 14:23 +0000
csiph-web