Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #34027

Re: Imaging libraries in active development?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <torriem@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'pil': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'fork': 0.09; 'stable.': 0.09; 'up-to-date': 0.13; 'student': 0.15; 'bugs,': 0.16; 'curious.': 0.16; 'development?': 0.16; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'recently.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'fix': 0.17; 'odd': 0.17; 'obviously': 0.18; 'versions': 0.20; 'bit': 0.21; 'libraries': 0.22; "i'd": 0.22; 'seems': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'bugs': 0.27; 'updating': 0.27; 'converting': 0.27; 'library.': 0.27; 'interface': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'fixed': 0.28; 'subject:development': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'maybe': 0.29; 'notes': 0.30; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.36; 'wanted': 0.36; 'development.': 0.36; 'author': 0.37; 'reported': 0.37; 'quite': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'most': 0.61; 'kind': 0.61; 'course.': 0.62; 'have?': 0.84; 'spoiled': 0.84
X-Virus-Scanned amavisd-new at torriefamily.org
Date Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:14:30 -0700
From Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121115 Thunderbird/10.0.11
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Imaging libraries in active development?
References <ed0f3366-d0e9-4d87-94e0-d3fb48b34b65@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To <ed0f3366-d0e9-4d87-94e0-d3fb48b34b65@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.341.1354126481.29569.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 21
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1354126481 news.xs4all.nl 6895 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:58813
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:34027

Show key headers only | View raw

On 11/28/2012 05:30 AM, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
> I'm investigating Python for image processing (having used Matlab,
> then Octave for some years).  And I'm spoiled for choice: PIL and its
> fork pillow, scipy.ndimage, scikits-image, mahotas, the Python
> interface to openCV...
> 
> However, PIL doesn't seem to be in active development.  What I want
> to know is - what are the current "standard" libraries for image
> processing in Python which are in active development?
> 
> I have quite a few image processing student notes which I'm thinking
> of converting to Python, but I'd like to use the most up-to-date
> library.

I'm curious.  What features do you need that pil doesn't have?  Other
than updating pil to fix bugs, support new image types or new versions
of Python, what kind of active development do you think it needs to
have? Maybe pil has all the features the original author wanted and is
pretty stable.  To judge a package on how fast it's changing seems a bit
odd to me.  Obviously you want to know that bugs can get fixed of
course.  Perhaps none have been reported recently.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Imaging libraries in active development? Alasdair McAndrew <amca01@gmail.com> - 2012-11-28 04:30 -0800
  Re: Imaging libraries in active development? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2012-11-28 11:14 -0700
    Re: Imaging libraries in active development? Alasdair McAndrew <amca01@gmail.com> - 2012-11-28 22:53 -0800
      Re: Imaging libraries in active development? Adrien <adnothing@gmail.com> - 2012-11-29 10:29 +0100
        Re: Imaging libraries in active development? Alasdair McAndrew <amca01@gmail.com> - 2012-11-29 03:22 -0800
        Re: Imaging libraries in active development? Alasdair McAndrew <amca01@gmail.com> - 2012-11-29 03:22 -0800
    Re: Imaging libraries in active development? Alasdair McAndrew <amca01@gmail.com> - 2012-11-28 22:53 -0800
  Re: Imaging libraries in active development? Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> - 2012-11-28 20:00 +0100
    Re: Imaging libraries in active development? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-11-28 21:11 +0000
      Re: Imaging libraries in active development? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-11-28 19:27 -0500
        Imaging library zoom <zoom@yahoo.com> - 2012-11-29 10:01 +0100
      Re: Imaging libraries in active development? Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> - 2012-11-29 09:37 +0100
  Re: Imaging libraries in active development? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-11-29 18:45 +0000
  RE: Imaging libraries in active development? "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-11-29 23:04 +0000

csiph-web